CBB Matchups
Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.
College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.
Non-conferenceJoel & Diane Bloom Wellness and Events Center, Newark, NJ
Manhattan
Efficiency #328
2025-26: 12-20 · 8-13 conf
@
NJIT
Efficiency #331
2025-26: 16-17 · 11-7 conf
Wed, Nov 25 · TBD
72.6
win 37%
Projected
76.4
win 63%
No line posted yet.
Model: NJIT −3.9 · total 149.0 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3
Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.
How the projection is built
each step, from an average D-I game to this oneProjected total
Average D-I game
148.2
PaceAdjusted tempo: NJIT 68.7, Manhattan 68.7 → 69.1 possessions
+1.7
NJIT offense vs Manhattan defense
−0.5
Manhattan offense vs NJIT defense
−0.4
Projected total
149.0
Axis starts at 147 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Projected margin
Even game
0.0
NJIT offense vs Manhattan defense
−0.5
Manhattan offense vs NJIT defense
+0.4
Home court+2.9 points per 100 possessions to the home offense, −2.9 to the visitors
+4.0
NJIT by 3.9
3.9
Manhattan side ◂▸ NJIT side
Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help NJIT.
Pace & total
possessions per 40 minutesTempo, possessions per 40 minutes
Projected possessions: 69.1, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, Manhattan is the faster team (68.1, #195 of 365) and NJIT the slower (67.9, #204). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).
Projected possessions
69.1
per team, 40 min
Projected total
149.0
model
Projected team totals
72.6 / 76.4
Manhattan / NJIT
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
68.7#143
Manhattan
68.7#140
NJIT
How this game plays
what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meetAdvantageManhattan
Where Manhattan struggles: shooting
Manhattan shoots an effective 47.9% (#315); NJIT allows 50.0% (#99). Expect about 48.7%, 2.6 points below an average D1 matchup — worth roughly -3.7 points per 100 possessions.
Watch for noise
3-point caution
A notable season 3-point number here (NJIT, Manhattan's defense) is close to a coin flip going forward — the study's model of next-game 3P% barely beats guessing the D1 average. Shot volume is what actually carries: expect Manhattan at about 38.3% of its shots from three, NJIT about 39.1%.
AdvantageNJIT
Where NJIT struggles: shooting
NJIT shoots an effective 46.7% (#342); Manhattan allows 53.9% (#297). Expect about 50.0%, 1.3 points below an average D1 matchup — worth roughly -1.8 points per 100 possessions.
ClashNJIT
Style clash: ball movement
NJIT creates off the dribble (assists on 45.7% of its baskets); Manhattan allows assists on 61.5% of opponents' baskets (D1 average 52.4%). Expect about 53.9% — the offense's habit usually carries a bit more weight (0.65 vs 0.65).
Manhattan has the ball
OffenseNJIT allowsvs D1 avg
47.9% #315
50.0% #99
-3.7 pt/100
15.6% #111
16.2% #210
+1.3 pt/100
28.6% #247
32.1% #264
-0.3 pt/100
34.0% #208
37.9% #258
+0.2 pt/100
79.6% #3
—
+0.6 pt/100
Manhattan net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: -2.0 pts/100
NJIT has the ball
OffenseManhattan allowsvs D1 avg
46.7% #342
53.9% #297
-1.8 pt/100
17.1% #210
16.7% #175
-0.1 pt/100
26.2% #316
37.0% #358
+0.2 pt/100
33.2% #233
25.7% #11
-0.8 pt/100
70.5% #253
—
-0.2 pt/100
NJIT net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: -2.7 pts/100
Shot diet
Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbersManhattanoffense vsNJITdefense
Share of shots by zone
Manhattan shoots
38.9
6.2
17.8
37.1
NJIT allows
40.9
4.3
13.8
40.9
D-I average
38.5
6.4
15.8
39.3
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 50.2%#360 | 57.8%#142 | 58.6% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 43.8%#85 | 43.7%#261 | 39.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 42.9%#38 | 30.7%#7 | 38.0% |
| Three | 32.0%#280 | 32.3%#79 | 33.7% |
NJIToffense vsManhattandefense
Share of shots by zone
NJIT shoots
33.9
6.7
19.6
39.7
Manhattan allows
40.7
5.9
15.2
38.2
D-I average
38.5
6.4
15.8
39.3
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 53.7%#324 | 58.5%#166 | 58.6% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 40.7%#152 | 42.5%#237 | 39.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 38.4%#175 | 42.7%#326 | 38.0% |
| Three | 30.4%#336 | 36.6%#332 | 33.7% |
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three
Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).
Shot volume
Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbersManhattan
+0.3extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#168 of 365
Off reb %
28.6%
#247
Def reb %
63.0%
#358
Turnover %
15.6%
#111
Forced TO %
16.7%
#175
FT rate
34.0%
#208
FT allowed
25.7%
#11
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−0.6
Defensive rebounding−2.0
Ball security+0.8
Forcing turnovers0.0
Foul shots drawn−0.2
Foul shots allowed+2.4
NJIT
−3.5extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#316 of 365
Off reb %
26.2%
#316
Def reb %
67.9%
#264
Turnover %
17.1%
#210
Forced TO %
16.2%
#210
FT rate
33.2%
#233
FT allowed
37.9%
#258
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−1.3
Defensive rebounding−0.5
Ball security−0.2
Forcing turnovers−0.3
Foul shots drawn−0.5
Foul shots allowed−0.7
Manhattan has more extra scoring chances per game: +0.3 (#168 of 365) to NJIT’s −3.5 (#316).
Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).
Rotation
Manhattan2025-26 numbers
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Ben Tweedyat Colgate | G | Jr | 6'4" | 33-33 | 29.4 | 9.4 | 3.1 | 2.6 | 1.3 | 55.9% | 38.5% | 3.3 | 70.3% | 19.0% | |
| 12 | Josiah Sabinoat Niagara | G | Sr | 6'4" | 28-10 | 21.0 | 7.1 | 4.6 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 49.3% | 24.5% | 1.8 | 90.9% | 22.6% | |
| 10 | Quron Elliott | G | So | 6'2" | 29-0 | 12.0 | 3.6 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 47.3% | 31.8% | 0.8 | 70.8% | 20.0% | |
| 16 | Ognjen Stankovicat Akron | F | So | 6'8" | 18-0 | 6.6 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 55.4% | 20.0% | 0.3 | 58.8% | 22.1% | |
| 23 | Jackson Delaney | G | Sr | 6'5" | 18-0 | 5.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 42.9% | 36.4% | 0.6 | 0.0% | 11.9% | |
| 1 | Kevin Kearneyat Saint Joseph's | F | So | 6'7" | 14-0 | 4.1 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 18.8% | 0.0% | 0.6 | 50.0% | 22.5% | |
| 11 | Asier Miguel | G | So | 6'4" | 9-0 | 4.9 | 2.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 59.4% | 30.0% | 1.1 | 50.0% | 26.6% | |
| 87 | Liam McChesneyat Creighton | F | Sr | 6'10" | 3-0 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 25.0% | 0.0% | 0.7 | — | 42.1% | |
| 20 | Jaeden Robley | G | Fr | 6'5" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 9 | Jameson Borodawka | G | Fr | 5'10" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 22 | Nick Lukmann | G | Fr | 6'4" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 13 | Anthony Pacciarelli | G | So | 6'5" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 3 | DaSean Lewis | G | Jr | 5'10" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 7 | Dusan Eric | F | Fr | 6'8" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 2 | Isaac Johnson | F | Jr | 6'7" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 0 | Jahzar Greene | G | Fr | 5'11" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 14 | Novak Manojlovic | F | Fr | 6'8" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
Transfers in: Kevin Kearney (from Saint Joseph's), Liam McChesney (from Creighton), Josiah Sabino (from Niagara), Ognjen Stankovic (from Akron), Ben Tweedy (from Colgate)
NJIT2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted NJIT's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | David Bolden | G | Fr | 6'0" | 33-33 | 29.8 | 11.8 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.0 | 41.9% | 31.8% | 6.7 | 80.2% | 28.6% | |
| 24 | Ari Fulton | G | So | 6'7" | 33-32 | 28.3 | 10.9 | 6.2 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 47.1% | 26.2% | 3.2 | 78.9% | 24.2% | |
| 3 | Jordan Rogers | F | So | 6'6" | 33-33 | 26.6 | 5.8 | 5.2 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 54.7% | 33.3% | 1.8 | 66.7% | 14.7% | |
| 0 | Sebastian Robinson | G | Jr | 6'3" | 30-15 | 27.4 | 14.8 | 3.0 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 46.8% | 24.0% | 1.7 | 70.1% | 35.7% | |
| 11 | Melvyn Ebonkoli | F | Sr | 6'8" | 21-18 | 26.1 | 7.3 | 5.7 | 0.6 | 1.7 | 51.6% | — | 0.0 | 52.4% | 20.1% | |
| 25 | John Kelly | F | So | 6'8" | 33-0 | 15.6 | 4.3 | 2.5 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 47.1% | 34.2% | 1.2 | 68.8% | 17.6% | |
| 14 | Quentin Duncan | G | So | 6'4" | 33-4 | 13.6 | 4.4 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 50.8% | 37.6% | 2.6 | 52.0% | 19.9% | |
| 44 | Rocco Awad | G | Fr | 6'1" | 33-1 | 12.8 | 3.1 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 39.2% | 26.4% | 2.6 | 76.9% | 19.7% | |
| 32 | Malachi Arrington | C | So | 6'11" | 29-15 | 14.2 | 3.9 | 3.7 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 59.7% | — | 0.0 | 55.3% | 16.4% | |
| 2 | Jeremy Clayville | G | So | 6'1" | 16-14 | 19.4 | 6.8 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 42.7% | 30.1% | 5.2 | 100.0% | 26.6% | |
| 33 | Zack Scherler | F | Fr | 6'11" | 19-0 | 6.5 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 50.0% | — | 0.0 | 55.6% | 10.8% | |
| 8 | Jeffrey Akintolu | F | Jr | 6'7" | 19-0 | 5.6 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 30.0% | 13.3% | 0.8 | 50.0% | 13.9% | |
| 7 | Cameron Piggee | G | Jr | 6'1" | 18-0 | 5.4 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 41.9% | 32.0% | 1.4 | 85.7% | 21.9% | |
| 5 | AJ Altobelli | G | Fr | 6'0" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 13 | Stefan Jimenez-Vojnic | C | So | 6'11" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
Manhattan2025-26 numbers
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Ben Tweedyat Colgate | G | Jr | 6'4" | 33-33 | 29.4 | 9.4 | 3.1 | 2.6 | 1.3 | 55.9% | 38.5% | 3.3 | 70.3% | 19.0% | |
| 12 | Josiah Sabinoat Niagara | G | Sr | 6'4" | 28-10 | 21.0 | 7.1 | 4.6 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 49.3% | 24.5% | 1.8 | 90.9% | 22.6% | |
| 10 | Quron Elliott | G | So | 6'2" | 29-0 | 12.0 | 3.6 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 47.3% | 31.8% | 0.8 | 70.8% | 20.0% | |
| 16 | Ognjen Stankovicat Akron | F | So | 6'8" | 18-0 | 6.6 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 55.4% | 20.0% | 0.3 | 58.8% | 22.1% | |
| 23 | Jackson Delaney | G | Sr | 6'5" | 18-0 | 5.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 42.9% | 36.4% | 0.6 | 0.0% | 11.9% | |
| 1 | Kevin Kearneyat Saint Joseph's | F | So | 6'7" | 14-0 | 4.1 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 18.8% | 0.0% | 0.6 | 50.0% | 22.5% | |
| 11 | Asier Miguel | G | So | 6'4" | 9-0 | 4.9 | 2.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 59.4% | 30.0% | 1.1 | 50.0% | 26.6% | |
| 87 | Liam McChesneyat Creighton | F | Sr | 6'10" | 3-0 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 25.0% | 0.0% | 0.7 | — | 42.1% | |
| 20 | Jaeden Robley | G | Fr | 6'5" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 9 | Jameson Borodawka | G | Fr | 5'10" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 22 | Nick Lukmann | G | Fr | 6'4" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 13 | Anthony Pacciarelli | G | So | 6'5" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 3 | DaSean Lewis | G | Jr | 5'10" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 7 | Dusan Eric | F | Fr | 6'8" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 2 | Isaac Johnson | F | Jr | 6'7" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 0 | Jahzar Greene | G | Fr | 5'11" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 14 | Novak Manojlovic | F | Fr | 6'8" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
Transfers in: Kevin Kearney (from Saint Joseph's), Liam McChesney (from Creighton), Josiah Sabino (from Niagara), Ognjen Stankovic (from Akron), Ben Tweedy (from Colgate)
Trends
Last 10 games of 2025-26Manhattan
Against the spread
Season
11-20
Home
6-7
Road
4-11
Last 10
3-7
avg cover −0.1
Missed the spread 4 straightCovered 1 of 7 as an underdog
Over / under
Season
13-18
Home
6-7
Road
7-8
Last 10
4-6
avg vs total +0.1
Under 3 straightOver in 2 of 7 as an underdog
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5 | Fairfield | N | L 60–71 | +4.5 | L−6.5 | 148.0 | U131 | 88.3 | 104.5 | 67.9 |
| Mar 1 | Iona | H | L 65–69 | +2.0 | L−2.0 | 151.5 | U134 | 86.7 | 92.0 | 75.0 |
| Feb 27 | Saint Peter's | A | L 65–75 | +8.0 | L−2.0 | 145.0 | U140 | 103.6 | 119.5 | 62.8 |
| Feb 20 | Marist | H | L 70–84 | +5.0 | L−9.0 | 142.0 | O154 | 109.3 | 131.2 | 64.0 |
| Feb 15 | Canisius | A | W 69–65 | −1.5 | W+2.5 | 141.0 | U134 | 106.5 | 100.4 | 64.8 |
| Feb 13 | Niagara | A | W 76–69 | −2.0 | W+5.0 | 135.0 | O145 | 119.9 | 108.9 | 63.4 |
| Feb 7 | Sacred Heart | H | W 80–68 | +1.5 | W+13.5 | 161.0 | U148 | 112.6 | 95.7 | 71.1 |
| Feb 5 | Saint Peter's | H | L 75–80 | +4.5 | L−0.5 | 145.5 | O155 | 120.1 | 128.1 | 62.5 |
| Feb 1 | Mount St Marys | A | L 65–72 | +6.5 | L−0.5 | 146.5 | U137 | 99.4 | 110.1 | 65.4 |
| Jan 30 | Rider | H | W 95–90 | −6.0 | L−1.0 | 146.0 | O185 | 141.1 | 133.6 | 67.3 |
NJIT
Against the spread
Season
18-14
Home
6-7
Road
12-7
Last 10
5-5
avg cover −3.4
Covered the last gameCovered 2 of 6 as a favoriteCovered 3 of 4 as an underdog
Over / under
Season
14-18
Home
6-7
Road
8-11
Last 10
3-7
avg vs total −8.2
Under 2 straightOver in 1 of 6 as a favoriteOver in 2 of 4 as an underdog
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10 | Vermont | A | L 54–63 | +11.5 | W+2.5 | 135.0 | U117 | 85.4 | 99.6 | 63.2 |
| Mar 7 | Maine | H | W 60–58 | −3.5 | L−1.5 | 133.5 | U118 | 92.5 | 89.5 | 64.8 |
| Mar 3 | UMBC | H | L 52–91 | +5.0 | L−34.0 | 142.5 | O143 | 74.2 | 129.9 | 70.1 |
| Feb 28 | Bryant | A | L 52–69 | −1.5 | L−18.5 | 138.5 | U121 | 80.9 | 107.3 | 64.3 |
| Feb 21 | Vermont | H | L 64–70 | +6.5 | W+0.5 | 142.0 | U134 | 100.8 | 110.2 | 63.5 |
| Feb 19 | UAlbany | H | L 63–81 | −4.0 | L−22.0 | 143.0 | O144 | 105.7 | 136.0 | 59.6 |
| Feb 14 | Maine | A | W 67–58 | −2.0 | W+7.0 | 137.0 | U125 | 98.9 | 85.7 | 67.7 |
| Feb 12 | New Hampshire | A | W 76–70 | +2.5 | W+8.5 | 143.5 | O146 | 113.8 | 104.8 | 66.8 |
| Feb 7 | Binghamton | H | W 73–64 | −9.5 | L−0.5 | 140.5 | U137 | 110.5 | 96.9 | 66.0 |
| Feb 5 | UMass Lowell | H | W 81–56 | −1.0 | W+24.0 | 149.0 | U137 | 118.7 | 82.1 | 68.2 |
Records vs the closing line describe the past; ten games is a small sample.
Tale of the tape
national rank toned left for away, right for homeManhattanNJIT
Efficiency
105.7
100.5
115.7
110.6
68.7
68.7
—
—
Shooting
47.9%
46.7%
47.8%
47.5%
32.0%
30.4%
79.6%
70.5%
34.0%
33.2%
Ball control & glass
15.6%
17.1%
16.7%
16.2%
28.6%
26.2%
37.0%
32.1%
8.2%
9.6%
10.7%
9.0%
Style
37.1%
40.1%
41.4%
40.9%
11.1%
12.9%
49.6%
45.7%
28.1%
33.0%
Roster
3.05
2.09
6'4"
6'4.9"
7.4%
—
Offseason
roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model inputManhattan
Returning minutes: 7.4%Returning production: 5.3%
Lost
- Jaden Winston 35.3 mpg, 15.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Devin Dinkins 33.6 mpg, 12.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Fraser Roxburgh 30.6 mpg, 11.0 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Terrance Jones 28.2 mpg, 12.7 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Anthony Isaac 23.8 mpg, 9.5 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Marko Ljubicic 20.0 mpg, 5.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
- Ben Tweedy from Colgate · 29.4 mpg, 9.4 ppg last season
- Josiah Sabino from Niagara · 19.6 mpg, 6.6 ppg last season
- Ognjen Stankovic from Akron · 3.4 mpg, 1.2 ppg last season
- Kevin Kearney from Saint Joseph's · 1.6 mpg, 0.3 ppg last season
- Liam McChesney from Creighton · 0.2 mpg, 0.1 ppg last season
- Jameson Borodawka no D1 minutes last season
Returns 7% of last season's minutes; lost 5 of its top 5. Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).
NJIT
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted NJIT's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.
Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)
Head-to-head
this season and lastNo meetings the last two seasons.
The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.
What these numbers mean: line shopping.