CBB Matchups

Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.

College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.
Non-conferenceCam Henderson Center, Huntington, WV
Prairie View
Efficiency #303
2025-26: 19-18 · 13-9 conf
@
Marshall
Efficiency #175
2025-26: 19-13 · 11-8 conf
Wed, Nov 25 · TBD
74.0
win 20%
Projected
83.6
win 80%
No line posted yet.
Model: MRSH −9.6 · total 157.7 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3
Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.

How the projection is built

each step, from an average D-I game to this one
Projected total
Average D-I game
148.2
PaceAdjusted tempo: Marshall 69.7, Prairie View 70.5 → 71.8 possessions
+7.6
Marshall offense vs Prairie View defense
+3.6
Prairie View offense vs Marshall defense
−1.8
Projected total
157.7
Axis starts at 140 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Projected margin
Even game
0.0
Marshall offense vs Prairie View defense
+3.6
Prairie View offense vs Marshall defense
+1.8
Home court+2.9 points per 100 possessions to the home offense, −2.9 to the visitors
+4.1
Marshall by 9.6
9.6
Prairie View side ◂▸ Marshall side

Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1: the total steps add to 157.6 against a projected 157.7, and the margin steps add to +9.5 against +9.6. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help Marshall.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 71.8, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, Prairie View is the faster team (72.4, #16 of 365) and Marshall the slower (70.7, #66). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
71.8
per team, 40 min
Projected total
157.7
model
Projected team totals
74.0 / 83.6
Prairie View / Marshall
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
70.5#28
Prairie View
69.7#71
Marshall

How this game plays

what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meet
Pace
Track meet
Marshall averages 70.7 possessions per 40, Prairie View 72.4. Slower teams pull the pace toward themselves more than fast teams push it (0.80 vs 0.66 in five seasons of games), so expect about 73 — more possessions mean more points in the total and more chances for the better team to separate.
AdvantagePrairie View
Where Prairie View struggles: shooting
Prairie View shoots an effective 47.4% (#330); Marshall allows 50.3% (#118). Expect about 48.5%, 2.7 points below an average D1 matchup — worth roughly -3.9 points per 100 possessions.
ClashPrairie View
Style match: ball movement
Prairie View creates off the dribble (assists on 43.2% of its baskets); Marshall breaks up passing offenses (assists on 46.0% allowed) (D1 average 52.4%). Expect about 42.3% — both habits push the same way.
AdvantageMarshall
Where Marshall scores: shooting
Marshall shoots an effective 54.8% (#42); Prairie View allows 50.9% (#149). Expect about 53.1%, 1.9 points above an average D1 matchup — worth roughly +2.7 points per 100 possessions.
GlassMarshall
Marshall owns the glass
Projected offensive rebound rate of 33.9% is worth roughly +2.1 points per 100 possessions for Marshall's offense.
Watch for noise
3-point caution
A notable season 3-point number here (Marshall) is close to a coin flip going forward — the study's model of next-game 3P% barely beats guessing the D1 average. Shot volume is what actually carries: expect Prairie View at about 32.4% of its shots from three, Marshall about 39.1%.
Prairie View has the ball
OffenseMarshall allowsvs D1 avg
47.4% #330
50.3% #118
-3.9 pt/100
15.8% #124
16.3% #201
+1.1 pt/100
26.7% #305
33.8% #316
-0.6 pt/100
41.6% #35
41.1% #313
+0.8 pt/100
75.6% #63
—
+0.3 pt/100
Prairie View net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: -2.3 pts/100
Marshall has the ball
OffensePrairie View allowsvs D1 avg
54.8% #42
50.9% #149
+2.7 pt/100
16.6% #171
19.0% #50
-1.6 pt/100
31.9% #127
35.4% #344
+2.1 pt/100
29.2% #328
42.6% #333
+0.2 pt/100
73.0% #168
—
+0.1 pt/100
Marshall net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +3.4 pts/100

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbers
Prairie Viewoffense vsMarshalldefense
Share of shots by zone
Prairie View shoots
Marshall allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim55.1%#29660.2%#24158.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)37.6%#23135.8%#8739.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)36.8%#23034.0%#5038.0%
Three32.9%#23733.6%#16233.7%
Marshalloffense vsPrairie Viewdefense
Share of shots by zone
Marshall shoots
Prairie View allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim66.8%#858.2%#15058.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)36.8%#24834.9%#5639.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)36.9%#22935.3%#8338.0%
Three36.8%#3435.0%#24733.7%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbers
Prairie View
−0.7extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#211 of 365
Off reb %
26.7%
#305
Def reb %
64.6%
#344
Turnover %
15.8%
#124
Forced TO %
19.0%
#50
FT rate
41.6%
#35
FT allowed
42.6%
#333
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−1.2
Defensive rebounding−1.5
Ball security+0.7
Forcing turnovers+1.6
Foul shots drawn+1.7
Foul shots allowed−1.9
Marshall
−3.7extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#322 of 365
Off reb %
31.9%
#127
Def reb %
66.2%
#316
Turnover %
16.6%
#171
Forced TO %
16.3%
#201
FT rate
29.2%
#328
FT allowed
41.1%
#313
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+0.5
Defensive rebounding−1.0
Ball security+0.1
Forcing turnovers−0.3
Foul shots drawn−1.5
Foul shots allowed−1.5

Prairie View has more extra scoring chances per game: −0.7 (#211 of 365) to Marshall’s −3.7 (#322).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Prairie View2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted Prairie View's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%UsageStatus
12Lance WilliamsGSr6'1"37-3735.610.13.23.21.550.4%41.8%1.880.1%15.8%
13Cory WellsFSr6'7"37-3733.213.27.12.12.244.0%35.5%3.374.2%25.8%
2Dontae HorneGSr6'4"37-3432.320.14.52.92.648.6%32.0%4.180.2%35.7%
3Tai'Reon JosephGSr6'3"29-2329.917.72.30.91.749.0%31.2%7.176.5%32.7%
4Corey DunningFSr6'9"34-1817.91.23.20.60.454.1%0.0%0.125.0%4.9%
0Joey MadimbaGSr6'5"27-717.18.13.30.50.850.6%24.5%2.072.1%26.0%
25Keeshawn MasonFSr6'8"29-1915.24.62.80.30.449.5%33.3%0.865.9%16.8%
23Elijah MitchellGSo6'5"28-412.12.41.40.60.145.7%42.1%0.786.7%10.6%
10Jannoy ThomasGJr5'11"28-010.92.41.40.70.559.5%0.0%0.168.0%11.6%
11Hassane DialloFJr6'8"27-310.73.13.00.30.750.9%—0.060.9%18.3%
24Marcel BryantFJr6'7"13-012.86.52.80.31.457.4%40.0%1.276.7%26.8%
5Doug YoungGSr6'0"3-326.39.32.31.72.751.9%36.4%3.7—22.2%
34Ryan Bolton Jr.CSo6'10"13-05.81.72.10.20.683.3%—0.066.7%14.0%
15Seryee LewisFSr6'9"4-06.52.01.30.01.342.9%—0.050.0%27.1%
1Isaiah FosterGJr6'1"5-04.42.01.00.40.280.0%66.7%0.6100.0%15.3%
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.

Tale of the tape

national rank toned left for away, right for home
Prairie ViewMarshall
Efficiency
103.2
111.3
110.8
111.2
70.5
69.7
—
—
Shooting
47.4%
54.8%
46.5%
54.6%
32.9%
36.8%
75.6%
73.0%
41.6%
29.2%
Ball control & glass
15.8%
16.6%
19.0%
16.3%
26.7%
31.9%
35.4%
33.8%
8.8%
10.1%
8.2%
8.1%
Style
30.6%
44.3%
41.8%
37.7%
17.7%
15.3%
43.2%
56.5%
24.1%
32.6%
Roster
3.78
3.30
6'4.6"
6'4.6"
—
85.4%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Prairie View
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted Prairie View's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.

Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)

Marshall
Returning minutes: 85.4%Returning production: 80.3%
Lost
  • Wyatt Fricks 29.1 mpg, 15.7 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Kaiden White no D1 minutes last season
  • Will Moore no D1 minutes last season

No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.

Returns 85% of last season's minutes; lost 1 of its top 5. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Head-to-head

this season and last
No meetings the last two seasons.

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.