CBB Matchups
Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.
How the projection is built
each step, from an average D-I game to this oneSteps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1: the margin steps add to +5.0 against +4.9. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help LSU N Orleans.
Pace & total
possessions per 40 minutesProjected possessions: 70.0, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, LSU N Orleans is the faster team (69.7, #107 of 365) and FGCU the slower (69.1, #142). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).
How this game plays
what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meetShot diet
Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbers| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 61.2%#89 | 54.3%#46 | 58.6% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 40.0%#171 | 36.9%#108 | 39.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 42.0%#55 | 41.2%#280 | 38.0% |
| Three | 33.2%#219 | 32.4%#86 | 33.7% |
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 56.9%#244 | 59.6%#212 | 58.6% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 43.8%#86 | 39.8%#188 | 39.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 38.4%#177 | 37.6%#147 | 38.0% |
| Three | 31.8%#287 | 35.4%#275 | 33.7% |
Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).
Shot volume
Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbersFGCU has more extra scoring chances per game: −0.9 (#221 of 365) to LSU N Orleans’s −1.5 (#256).
Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).
Rotation
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rahmir Barno | G | Jr | 6'0" | 34-34 | 31.6 | 11.7 | 2.8 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 48.2% | 31.0% | 1.7 | 65.3% | 24.5% | |
| 20 | J.R. Konieczny | F | Sr | 6'7" | 30-28 | 31.6 | 15.6 | 6.8 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 50.1% | 32.6% | 4.5 | 73.2% | 30.0% | |
| 7 | Jordan Ellerbee | G | Fr | 6'2" | 34-24 | 27.0 | 13.1 | 3.4 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 54.6% | 35.3% | 4.6 | 73.4% | 28.3% | |
| 15 | Michael Duax | F | Sr | 6'5" | 34-31 | 24.5 | 7.7 | 5.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 56.5% | 21.4% | 0.8 | 72.0% | 18.6% | |
| 32 | Isaiah Malone | F | Jr | 6'8" | 34-27 | 22.4 | 10.5 | 5.8 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 61.8% | 44.0% | 0.7 | 78.2% | 24.4% | |
| 6 | Rory Stewart | F | Sr | 6'8" | 30-7 | 21.6 | 7.1 | 2.9 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 48.3% | 32.1% | 5.5 | 64.7% | 20.6% | |
| 2 | Darren Williams | G | So | 6'4" | 34-10 | 18.6 | 6.2 | 1.9 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 50.5% | 35.7% | 4.1 | 100.0% | 20.1% | |
| 21 | Tristen Guillouette | C | So | 6'10" | 29-7 | 13.4 | 3.4 | 3.0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 53.0% | — | 0.0 | 63.6% | 15.1% | |
| 0 | Jack Reddick | G | So | 6'3" | 32-0 | 10.9 | 2.5 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 42.9% | 22.4% | 1.5 | 63.2% | 17.8% | |
| 3 | Gabe Tanner | F | Fr | 6'4" | 15-0 | 9.9 | 2.8 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 50.0% | 28.6% | 1.9 | 50.0% | 19.4% | |
| 10 | George Washington III | G | Jr | 6'2" | 14-2 | 9.0 | 3.1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 38.9% | 25.0% | 2.9 | 100.0% | 29.8% | |
| 4 | Matt McCarthy | G | Fr | 6'3" | 13-0 | 2.8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 42.9% | 33.3% | 0.5 | 50.0% | 13.6% | |
| 31 | Brandon Dwyer | G | Sr | 6'3" | 3-0 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0% | 66.7% | 1.0 | — | 23.8% | |
| 8 | BB Washington | G | So | 6'5" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 23 | Chase Konieczny | F | Fr | 6'4" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 12 | Evan Barlow | F | Fr | 6'4" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | Coleton Benson | G | Sr | 6'2" | 33-33 | 34.3 | 16.2 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 51.0% | 35.9% | 7.5 | 92.8% | 26.5% | |
| 5 | Jakevion Buckley | G | Sr | 6'2" | 32-29 | 33.9 | 13.8 | 4.7 | 5.6 | 4.1 | 43.2% | 31.2% | 2.9 | 77.1% | 30.1% | |
| 23 | MJ Thomas | F | So | 6'8" | 32-30 | 26.8 | 10.8 | 8.0 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 53.6% | 66.7% | 0.1 | 73.3% | 23.7% | |
| 6 | TJ Cope | G | Jr | 6'7" | 32-20 | 21.3 | 8.3 | 2.9 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 57.5% | 24.1% | 0.9 | 68.7% | 21.5% | |
| 9 | Churchill Abass | C | Jr | 6'10" | 33-27 | 20.1 | 8.4 | 5.7 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 63.1% | 0.0% | 0.1 | 56.7% | 23.9% | |
| 25 | Enzo Boudouma | F | Fr | 6'9" | 32-6 | 18.3 | 5.3 | 3.1 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 45.2% | 27.0% | 2.3 | 72.3% | 18.9% | |
| 21 | Kedrick Osby | F | Jr | 6'7" | 32-7 | 17.2 | 4.9 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 50.8% | 40.0% | 1.7 | 75.8% | 16.9% | |
| 99 | Panagiotis Pagonis | F | Fr | 6'9" | 30-7 | 17.6 | 4.1 | 3.1 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 39.8% | 24.5% | 1.6 | 72.0% | 16.6% | |
| 3 | Irish Coquia | G | Jr | 6'2" | 25-3 | 9.6 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 45.9% | 34.1% | 1.6 | 84.6% | 20.8% | |
| 15 | Jamal Chretien II | G | Fr | 6'6" | 14-3 | 9.1 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 36.4% | 15.4% | 0.9 | 75.0% | 12.1% | |
| 11 | Mathok Majok | C | Jr | 7'4" | 16-0 | 4.9 | 2.2 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 73.7% | — | 0.0 | 53.8% | 20.8% | |
| 0 | Hercy Miller | G | Sr | 6'3" | 9-0 | 5.6 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 26.9% | 0.0% | 0.9 | 0.0% | 36.3% | |
| 7 | Grant Kemp | G | Sr | 5'9" | 7-0 | 4.9 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 18.2% | 0.0% | 0.4 | 71.4% | 29.1% | |
| 20 | William Patterson | C | So | 7'2" | 7-0 | 4.3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 20.0% | — | 0.0 | — | 13.0% | |
| 13 | Vieux Sanneh | F | Fr | 6'5" | 2-0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | — | 0.0 | 100.0% | 14.6% | |
| 10 | Eze Nwakamma | F | Fr | 6'8" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rahmir Barno | G | Jr | 6'0" | 34-34 | 31.6 | 11.7 | 2.8 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 48.2% | 31.0% | 1.7 | 65.3% | 24.5% | |
| 20 | J.R. Konieczny | F | Sr | 6'7" | 30-28 | 31.6 | 15.6 | 6.8 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 50.1% | 32.6% | 4.5 | 73.2% | 30.0% | |
| 7 | Jordan Ellerbee | G | Fr | 6'2" | 34-24 | 27.0 | 13.1 | 3.4 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 54.6% | 35.3% | 4.6 | 73.4% | 28.3% | |
| 15 | Michael Duax | F | Sr | 6'5" | 34-31 | 24.5 | 7.7 | 5.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 56.5% | 21.4% | 0.8 | 72.0% | 18.6% | |
| 32 | Isaiah Malone | F | Jr | 6'8" | 34-27 | 22.4 | 10.5 | 5.8 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 61.8% | 44.0% | 0.7 | 78.2% | 24.4% | |
| 6 | Rory Stewart | F | Sr | 6'8" | 30-7 | 21.6 | 7.1 | 2.9 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 48.3% | 32.1% | 5.5 | 64.7% | 20.6% | |
| 2 | Darren Williams | G | So | 6'4" | 34-10 | 18.6 | 6.2 | 1.9 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 50.5% | 35.7% | 4.1 | 100.0% | 20.1% | |
| 21 | Tristen Guillouette | C | So | 6'10" | 29-7 | 13.4 | 3.4 | 3.0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 53.0% | — | 0.0 | 63.6% | 15.1% | |
| 0 | Jack Reddick | G | So | 6'3" | 32-0 | 10.9 | 2.5 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 42.9% | 22.4% | 1.5 | 63.2% | 17.8% | |
| 3 | Gabe Tanner | F | Fr | 6'4" | 15-0 | 9.9 | 2.8 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 50.0% | 28.6% | 1.9 | 50.0% | 19.4% | |
| 10 | George Washington III | G | Jr | 6'2" | 14-2 | 9.0 | 3.1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 38.9% | 25.0% | 2.9 | 100.0% | 29.8% | |
| 4 | Matt McCarthy | G | Fr | 6'3" | 13-0 | 2.8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 42.9% | 33.3% | 0.5 | 50.0% | 13.6% | |
| 31 | Brandon Dwyer | G | Sr | 6'3" | 3-0 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0% | 66.7% | 1.0 | — | 23.8% | |
| 8 | BB Washington | G | So | 6'5" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 23 | Chase Konieczny | F | Fr | 6'4" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 12 | Evan Barlow | F | Fr | 6'4" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
Trends
Last 10 games of 2025-26| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7 | C Arkansas | N | L 63–73 | +4.5 | L−5.5 | 145.0 | U136 | 89.9 | 104.2 | 70.0 |
| Mar 6 | Lipscomb | N | W 77–53 | +4.5 | W+28.5 | 150.0 | U130 | 122.2 | 84.1 | 63.0 |
| Mar 4 | North Alabama | N | W 69–58 | −7.5 | W+3.5 | 139.5 | U127 | 110.7 | 93.1 | 62.3 |
| Feb 28 | Stetson | A | L 63–78 | −5.5 | L−20.5 | 151.5 | U141 | 93.2 | 115.3 | 67.6 |
| Feb 26 | North Florida | A | L 70–76 | −7.0 | L−13.0 | 161.0 | U146 | 101.2 | 109.8 | 69.2 |
| Feb 21 | C Arkansas | H | W 75–71 OT | +1.0 | W+5.0 | 153.0 | U146 | 104.4 | 98.8 | 71.9 |
| Feb 18 | Jacksonville | H | W 86–84 | −6.5 | L−4.5 | 136.0 | O170 | 130.6 | 127.6 | 65.8 |
| Feb 14 | Stetson | H | W 78–76 | −10.5 | L−8.5 | 148.5 | O154 | 114.8 | 111.8 | 68.0 |
| Feb 11 | North Florida | H | W 90–81 | −12.5 | L−3.5 | 163.5 | O171 | 123.6 | 111.2 | 72.8 |
| Feb 7 | Bellarmine | A | L 65–81 | −2.0 | L−18.0 | 152.5 | U146 | 96.5 | 120.3 | 67.3 |
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9 | Texas A&M-CC | N | L 61–74 | +2.0 | L−11.0 | 147.5 | U135 | 104.8 | 127.1 | 58.2 |
| Mar 8 | Hou Christian | N | W 73–60 | −4.0 | W+9.0 | 143.0 | U133 | 103.3 | 84.9 | 70.7 |
| Mar 2 | SE Louisiana | H | L 78–82 | −7.0 | L−11.0 | 144.0 | O160 | 104.8 | 110.2 | 74.4 |
| Feb 28 | McNeese | H | L 63–66 | +10.0 | W+7.0 | 150.5 | U129 | 97.5 | 102.1 | 64.6 |
| Feb 23 | SF Austin | A | W 77–73 | +11.5 | W+15.5 | 152.0 | U150 | 113.4 | 107.5 | 67.9 |
| Feb 21 | Lamar | A | W 77–71 | +5.5 | W+11.5 | 146.5 | O148 | 109.8 | 101.3 | 70.1 |
| Feb 16 | Incarnate Word | A | W 78–64 | +2.0 | W+16.0 | 153.5 | U142 | 120.9 | 99.2 | 64.5 |
| Feb 14 | Hou Christian | A | L 60–61 | +1.0 | P0.0 | 149.0 | U121 | 96.6 | 98.2 | 62.1 |
| Feb 9 | Texas A&M-CC | H | W 84–78 OT | +1.5 | W+7.5 | 147.0 | O162 | 96.5 | 89.6 | 87.1 |
| Feb 7 | UT Rio Grande | H | L 76–95 | +1.5 | L−17.5 | 151.0 | O171 | 102.0 | 127.5 | 74.5 |
Records vs the closing line describe the past; ten games is a small sample.
Tale of the tape
national rank toned left for away, right for homeOffseason
roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model inputReturns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)
Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)
Head-to-head
this season and lastThe CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.
What these numbers mean: line shopping.