Yale Bulldogs vs Belmont Bruins basketball preview & prediction

Mon, Nov 23 · 4:00 PM ET · State Farm Field House, Kissimmee, FL (neutral site)

ESPN Events Invitational - Adventure BracketNeutral siteNon-conferenceESPNUState Farm Field House, Kissimmee, FL
Yale
1-1 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #90
vs
Belmont
2-0 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #71
Mon, Nov 23 · 4:00 PM ET
Our projected score shows once the market opens.
No line posted yet.

Our play

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 69.5, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, Belmont is the faster team (73.0, #106 of 365) and Yale the slower (67.4, #275). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
69.5
per team, 40 min
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
67.8#333
Yale
72.3#80
Belmont

How this game plays

points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchup
From the four factors
Belmont has the ball0.0
Yale has the ball−9.9
Belmont has the ball
✓Shoots it welleFG% 57.7% #58 · YALE allows 44.9% #77+1.5
✗Few second chancesOR% 21.9% #322 · YALE allows 38.2% #296−1.5
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 26.0% #342 · YALE forces 9.6% #350 · ~12 turnovers+0.9
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 36.5% #181 · YALE allows 29.4% #92 · FT 63.2% #278−0.8
Yale has the ball
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 47.2% #238 · BEL allows 36.1% #12−9.0
✗Coughs it upTO% 18.5% #201 · BEL forces 26.0% #24 · ~16 turnovers−4.4
✓Wins second chancesOR% 39.5% #52 · BEL allows 35.6% #260+3.2
✓Gets to the lineFTR 28.2% #276 · BEL allows 31.1% #113 · FT 85.7% #11+0.3

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot
Yaleoffense vsBelmontdefense
Share of shots by zone
Yale shoots
Belmont allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim46.7%#30550.0%#7558.0%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)50.0%#7566.7%#32238.2%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)40.9%#11615.4%#4434.7%
Three34.7%#13419.0%#1332.5%
Belmontoffense vsYaledefense
Share of shots by zone
Belmont shoots
Yale allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim66.7%#8348.3%#6258.0%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)100.0%#120.0%#5438.2%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)33.3%#17453.8%#31334.7%
Three30.0%#22124.0%#3832.5%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line
Yale
−5.9extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#264 of 365
Off reb %
39.5%
#52
Def reb %
61.8%
#296
Turnover %
18.5%
#201
Forced TO %
9.6%
#350
FT rate
28.2%
#276
FT allowed
29.4%
#92
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+2.6
Defensive rebounding−2.2
Ball security−0.2
Forcing turnovers−6.0
Foul shots drawn−2.4
Foul shots allowed+2.2
Belmont
−2.9extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#221 of 365
Off reb %
21.9%
#322
Def reb %
64.4%
#260
Turnover %
26.0%
#342
Forced TO %
26.0%
#24
FT rate
36.5%
#181
FT allowed
31.1%
#113
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−3.2
Defensive rebounding−1.3
Ball security−5.5
Forcing turnovers+5.7
Foul shots drawn−0.2
Foul shots allowed+1.8

Belmont has more extra scoring chances per game: −2.9 (#221 of 365) to Yale’s −5.9 (#264).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Who has been playing, and who has not
Yale2026-27 numbers · last game: UCF, Nov 6
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGMin/40, last 8Last 3 vs beforeStatusPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%Usage
9FJr6'6"2-234.534—Started last21.55.00.52.558.1%42.9%7.0100.0%33.4%
11GSr6'1"2-234.534—Started last14.54.03.03.042.5%37.5%4.092.3%27.4%
3GJr6'4"2-232.030—Started last14.03.52.53.047.6%25.0%4.072.7%29.6%
7FSo6'11"2-228.031—Started last6.58.01.00.072.2%60.0%2.5—9.4%
12FSo6'7"2-227.528—Started last7.010.01.01.540.0%—0.0100.0%20.3%
0GSo6'2"2-024.528—Bench8.07.03.02.033.3%16.7%6.0—33.4%
21FJr6'6"2-011.09—Bench1.50.50.00.550.0%50.0%1.0—10.7%
13CFr6'10"2-05.05—Bench0.01.00.50.00.0%—0.0—5.9%
22GSr6'4"1-04.00—Missed last game1.01.00.00.0——0.050.0%14.3%

Competitive minutes leave out garbage time (provisional rule: a second-half lead of 25+ inside 15:00, 20+ inside 10:00, 15+ inside 5:00 or 10+ inside 2:00, held to the end) and are shown per 40 minutes. Status says only whether a player appeared; the reason is not published.

Team comparison

national rank toned left for away, right for home
YaleBelmont
Efficiency
112.8
110.9
106.0
102.0
67.8
72.3
3.2
-10.0
Shooting
47.2%
57.7%
44.0%
65.6%
34.7%
30.0%
85.7%
63.2%
28.2%
36.5%
Ball control & glass
18.5%
26.0%
9.6%
26.0%
39.5%
21.9%
38.2%
35.6%
13.4%
16.4%
14.7%
9.4%
Style
39.5%
38.5%
34.0%
55.6%
15.0%
16.7%
46.0%
40.7%
21.4%
39.3%
Roster
2.73
2.61
6'5.2"
6'5.7"
36.1%
38.3%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Yale
Returning minutes: 36.8%Returning production: 33.4%
Lost
  • Nick Townsend 32.4 mpg, 15.7 ppg · transferred to Stanford
  • Isaac Celiscar 31.1 mpg, 13.2 ppg · transferred to Baylor
  • Casey Simmons 26.6 mpg, 10.5 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Samson Aletan 24.2 mpg, 7.3 ppg · transferred to Providence
  • Devon Arlington 13.7 mpg, 2.7 ppg · transferred to Stonehill
Added
  • Tim Winkler no D1 minutes last season
  • Chris Bolte no D1 minutes last season
  • Jack Louridas no D1 minutes last season
  • Connor May no D1 minutes last season
  • Jonas Oware no D1 minutes last season
  • Brady Wooley no D1 minutes last season

No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.

Returns 37% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (3 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Belmont
Returning minutes: 38.3%Returning production: 34.2%
Lost
  • Tyler Lundblade 34.3 mpg, 15.6 ppg · transferred to Tennessee
  • Sam Orme 23.2 mpg, 11.5 ppg · transferred to Nebraska
  • Drew Scharnowski 20.3 mpg, 10.1 ppg · transferred to Duke
  • Brigham Rogers 18.2 mpg, 7.1 ppg · transferred to Murray St
  • Nic McClain 11.9 mpg, 4.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Win Miller 7.3 mpg, 2.5 ppg · transferred to Samford
Added
  • Kayden Fish from Ball State · 13.7 mpg, 5.4 ppg last season
  • Vincent Neugebauer from FAU · 3.2 mpg, 1.0 ppg last season
  • Matthew Zobrist from Bradley · 1.9 mpg, 0.6 ppg last season
  • Aleksa Ristic from Indiana · 1.0 mpg, 0.2 ppg last season
  • Ethan Sage no D1 minutes last season
  • Eli Brown no D1 minutes last season

Returns 38% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (4 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Head-to-head

this season and last
No meetings the last two seasons.

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.