CBB Matchups
Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.
College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.
Non-conferenceKirby Sports Center, Easton, PALafayette Classic
Niagara
Efficiency #337
2025-26: 8-22 · 5-15 conf
@
Lafayette
Efficiency #319
2025-26: 11-21 · 8-11 conf
Fri, Nov 27 · TBD
67.0
win 33%
Projected
71.9
win 67%
No line posted yet.
Model: LAF −5.0 · total 138.9 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3
Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.
How the projection is built
each step, from an average D-I game to this oneProjected total
Average D-I game
148.2
PaceAdjusted tempo: Lafayette 68.0, Niagara 65.0 → 64.6 possessions
−8.0
Lafayette offense vs Niagara defense
0.0
Niagara offense vs Lafayette defense
−1.3
Projected total
138.9
Axis starts at 135 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Projected margin
Even game
0.0
Lafayette offense vs Niagara defense
0.0
Niagara offense vs Lafayette defense
+1.3
Home court+2.9 points per 100 possessions to the home offense, −2.9 to the visitors
+3.7
Lafayette by 5.0
5.0
Niagara side ◂▸ Lafayette side
Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help Lafayette.
Pace & total
possessions per 40 minutesTempo, possessions per 40 minutes
Projected possessions: 64.6, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, Lafayette is the faster team (66.9, #248 of 365) and Niagara the slower (63.1, #363). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).
Projected possessions
64.6
per team, 40 min
Projected total
138.9
model
Projected team totals
67.0 / 71.9
Niagara / Lafayette
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
65.0#364
Niagara
68.0#214
Lafayette
How this game plays
what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meetPace
Half-court grind
Lafayette averages 66.9 possessions per 40, Niagara 63.1. Slower teams pull the pace toward themselves more than fast teams push it (0.80 vs 0.66 in five seasons of games), so expect about 63 — more possessions mean more points in the total and more chances for the better team to separate.
AdvantageNiagara
Where Niagara struggles: the offensive glass
Niagara rebounds 24.8% of its own misses (#344); Lafayette lets opponents grab 28.6% of their own misses (#88). Expect about 25.6%, 4.8 points below an average D1 matchup — worth roughly -2.9 points per 100 possessions.
ClashNiagara
Style match: ball movement
Niagara assists on 60.0% of its made baskets; Lafayette allows assists on 59.0% of opponents' baskets (D1 average 52.4%). Expect about 61.6% — both habits push the same way.
Niagara has the ball
OffenseLafayette allowsvs D1 avg
50.5% #214
53.6% #286
+1.0 pt/100
18.9% #319
15.1% #276
-0.2 pt/100
24.8% #344
28.6% #88
-2.9 pt/100
26.6% #353
30.6% #76
-0.8 pt/100
72.2% #203
—
-0.0 pt/100
Niagara net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: -3.0 pts/100
Lafayette has the ball
OffenseNiagara allowsvs D1 avg
49.3% #278
52.8% #260
-0.5 pt/100
15.3% #90
16.6% #179
+1.2 pt/100
25.8% #326
32.9% #297
-1.2 pt/100
32.4% #249
33.8% #144
-0.2 pt/100
68.9% #303
—
-0.3 pt/100
Lafayette net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: -1.1 pts/100
Shot diet
Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbersNiagaraoffense vsLafayettedefense
Share of shots by zone
Niagara shoots
43.4
3.5
12.3
40.8
Lafayette allows
37.2
8.3
16.3
38.2
D-I average
38.5
6.4
15.8
39.3
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 54.1%#320 | 62.6%#314 | 58.6% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 31.3%#339 | 41.5%#224 | 39.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 40.0%#109 | 37.7%#152 | 38.0% |
| Three | 33.7%#188 | 36.0%#298 | 33.7% |
Lafayetteoffense vsNiagaradefense
Share of shots by zone
Lafayette shoots
41.6
5.2
13.5
39.7
Niagara allows
39.2
4.4
17.0
39.4
D-I average
38.5
6.4
15.8
39.3
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 57.1%#231 | 58.7%#176 | 58.6% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 40.7%#152 | 41.5%#225 | 39.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 32.9%#331 | 40.6%#260 | 38.0% |
| Three | 32.2%#273 | 35.3%#268 | 33.7% |
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three
Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).
Shot volume
Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbersNiagara
−5.9extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#356 of 365
Off reb %
24.8%
#344
Def reb %
67.1%
#297
Turnover %
18.9%
#319
Forced TO %
16.6%
#179
FT rate
26.6%
#353
FT allowed
33.8%
#144
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−1.8
Defensive rebounding−0.7
Ball security−1.5
Forcing turnovers−0.1
Foul shots drawn−2.2
Foul shots allowed+0.4
Lafayette
−0.4extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#194 of 365
Off reb %
25.8%
#326
Def reb %
71.4%
#88
Turnover %
15.3%
#90
Forced TO %
15.1%
#276
FT rate
32.4%
#249
FT allowed
30.6%
#76
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−1.5
Defensive rebounding+0.6
Ball security+1.0
Forcing turnovers−1.1
Foul shots drawn−0.7
Foul shots allowed+1.2
Lafayette has more extra scoring chances per game: −0.4 (#194 of 365) to Niagara’s −5.9 (#356).
Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).
Rotation
Niagara2025-26 numbers
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | Cole Farrellat Long Beach St | G | Sr | 6'5" | 32-32 | 20.7 | 6.4 | 2.2 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 43.7% | 27.5% | 1.6 | 65.4% | 21.6% | |
| 2 | Trenton Walters | G | Sr | 5'9" | 25-7 | 22.4 | 7.2 | 1.6 | 2.7 | 1.5 | 40.8% | 35.4% | 3.2 | 81.2% | 25.2% | |
| 4 | Logan Woodsat Wright St | G | Sr | 6'5" | 35-8 | 18.4 | 5.3 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 54.0% | 33.3% | 2.3 | 66.7% | 17.7% | |
| 8 | Bastien Rieberat Fresno St | G | Jr | 6'2" | 32-7 | 16.4 | 4.0 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 48.4% | 34.8% | 1.4 | 74.5% | 17.0% | |
| 77 | Tae Blackshearat Youngstown St | G | Sr | 6'6" | 30-0 | 14.6 | 6.8 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 50.0% | 32.8% | 4.0 | 76.2% | 29.7% | |
| 1 | Vukasin Todorovicat Green Bay | F | So | 6'8" | 20-0 | 9.8 | 2.9 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 42.5% | 14.3% | 0.3 | 60.0% | 24.5% | |
| 9 | Gael Dalmau | G | So | 6'6" | 8-0 | 6.8 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 41.2% | 26.7% | 1.9 | — | 23.8% | |
| 12 | Brian Angeletti | F | Fr | 6'8" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 24 | Daniel Emokhare | F | Fr | 6'8" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 5 | Fidel Rotta | F | Fr | 6'9" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 7 | Jackson Redmond | G | Jr | 6'4" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 6 | Noah Slingerland | F | Sr | 6'7" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 0 | Ruey Ruey | G | Fr | 6'5" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 13 | Samuele Miccoli | G | So | 6'3" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
Transfers in: Tae Blackshear (from Youngstown St), Cole Farrell (from Long Beach St), Bastien Rieber (from Fresno St), Vukasin Todorovic (from Green Bay), Logan Woods (from Wright St)
Lafayette2025-26 numbers
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Andrew Phillips | G | So | 6'4" | 32-32 | 33.4 | 13.9 | 4.6 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 48.1% | 31.1% | 6.5 | 71.3% | 26.3% | |
| 1 | Caleb Williams | G | Fr | 6'0" | 31-31 | 32.7 | 16.1 | 3.6 | 3.2 | 2.2 | 48.3% | 33.2% | 7.4 | 87.9% | 31.1% | |
| 22 | Christian Humphrey-Rembert | F | Fr | — | 32-31 | 30.1 | 7.7 | 6.6 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 52.4% | 37.2% | 4.9 | 66.0% | 15.6% | |
| 44 | Shareef Jackson | F | Fr | 6'8" | 30-30 | 22.1 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 57.1% | 0.0% | 0.1 | 52.4% | 29.6% | |
| 0 | Ryan Pettit | G | Jr | 6'2" | 28-3 | 20.8 | 5.6 | 3.3 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 52.0% | 25.0% | 1.4 | 58.3% | 16.9% | |
| 13 | Misha Bednostin | C | So | 6'11" | 28-0 | 10.0 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 57.7% | — | 0.0 | 55.6% | 11.1% | |
| 2 | KaiMani Murdock | G | So | 6'6" | 25-0 | 10.6 | 3.0 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 49.3% | 33.3% | 2.5 | 33.3% | 19.1% | |
| 34 | Luke Bevilacqua | F | Fr | 6'11" | 25-1 | 9.1 | 2.8 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 58.5% | — | 0.0 | 55.0% | 22.1% | |
| 24 | Folabomi Fayemi | G | Fr | 6'4" | 16-0 | 6.1 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 31.5% | 16.7% | 0.4 | 44.4% | 21.2% | |
| 23 | Joshua Wyche | G | So | 6'7" | 11-0 | 6.9 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 37.5% | 0.0% | 0.2 | 25.0% | 9.7% | |
| 20 | Ashton Wallace | G | Fr | 6'3" | 11-0 | 4.1 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 25.0% | 0.0% | 0.3 | 100.0% | 21.0% | |
| 14 | Malik Rasul | F | Fr | 6'7" | 7-0 | 6.0 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 42.9% | 0.0% | 0.1 | 50.0% | 18.4% | |
| 11 | Luke Azzinaro | F | Fr | 6'5" | 6-0 | 2.8 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 33.3% | 0.0% | 0.5 | — | 23.1% | |
| 3 | Beckett Currie | G | Fr | 5'11" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 22 | Chris Rubayo | F | Sr | 6'10" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 15 | Justin Vander Baan | C | Sr | 7'0" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 99 | Luka Savicevic | G | Sr | 6'3" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 9 | TJ Berger | G | Sr | 6'4" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
Niagara2025-26 numbers
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | Cole Farrellat Long Beach St | G | Sr | 6'5" | 32-32 | 20.7 | 6.4 | 2.2 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 43.7% | 27.5% | 1.6 | 65.4% | 21.6% | |
| 2 | Trenton Walters | G | Sr | 5'9" | 25-7 | 22.4 | 7.2 | 1.6 | 2.7 | 1.5 | 40.8% | 35.4% | 3.2 | 81.2% | 25.2% | |
| 4 | Logan Woodsat Wright St | G | Sr | 6'5" | 35-8 | 18.4 | 5.3 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 54.0% | 33.3% | 2.3 | 66.7% | 17.7% | |
| 8 | Bastien Rieberat Fresno St | G | Jr | 6'2" | 32-7 | 16.4 | 4.0 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 48.4% | 34.8% | 1.4 | 74.5% | 17.0% | |
| 77 | Tae Blackshearat Youngstown St | G | Sr | 6'6" | 30-0 | 14.6 | 6.8 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 50.0% | 32.8% | 4.0 | 76.2% | 29.7% | |
| 1 | Vukasin Todorovicat Green Bay | F | So | 6'8" | 20-0 | 9.8 | 2.9 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 42.5% | 14.3% | 0.3 | 60.0% | 24.5% | |
| 9 | Gael Dalmau | G | So | 6'6" | 8-0 | 6.8 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 41.2% | 26.7% | 1.9 | — | 23.8% | |
| 12 | Brian Angeletti | F | Fr | 6'8" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 24 | Daniel Emokhare | F | Fr | 6'8" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 5 | Fidel Rotta | F | Fr | 6'9" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 7 | Jackson Redmond | G | Jr | 6'4" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 6 | Noah Slingerland | F | Sr | 6'7" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 0 | Ruey Ruey | G | Fr | 6'5" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 13 | Samuele Miccoli | G | So | 6'3" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
Transfers in: Tae Blackshear (from Youngstown St), Cole Farrell (from Long Beach St), Bastien Rieber (from Fresno St), Vukasin Todorovic (from Green Bay), Logan Woods (from Wright St)
Trends
Last 10 games of 2025-26Niagara
Against the spread
Season
13-16
Home
7-5
Road
6-10
Last 10
6-4
avg cover +2.4
Covered 2 straightCovered 5 of 8 as an underdog
Over / under
Season
14-15
Home
6-6
Road
7-9
Last 10
6-4
avg vs total +2.7
Over 2 straightOver in 6 of 8 as an underdog
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1 | Merrimack | H | L 66–73 | +7.5 | W+0.5 | 127.0 | O139 | 108.9 | 120.5 | 60.6 |
| Feb 27 | Quinnipiac | H | W 78–76 OT | +8.5 | W+10.5 | 136.0 | O154 | 113.8 | 110.9 | 68.6 |
| Feb 22 | Rider | A | L 62–67 | −2.0 | L−7.0 | 130.5 | U129 | 95.5 | 103.3 | 64.9 |
| Feb 20 | Mount St Marys | A | L 63–76 | +7.5 | L−5.5 | 131.0 | O139 | 90.1 | 108.6 | 69.9 |
| Feb 15 | Iona | H | W 70–68 | +4.5 | W+6.5 | 132.0 | O138 | 124.8 | 121.2 | 56.1 |
| Feb 13 | Manhattan | H | L 69–76 | +2.0 | L−5.0 | 135.0 | O145 | 108.9 | 119.9 | 63.4 |
| Feb 7 | Quinnipiac | A | L 55–56 | +13.5 | W+12.5 | 137.5 | U111 | 92.9 | 94.6 | 59.2 |
| Feb 3 | Canisius | H | W 65–56 | −2.0 | W+7.0 | 127.0 | U121 | 113.0 | 97.3 | 57.5 |
| Feb 1 | Marist | H | L 46–58 | +9.5 | L−2.5 | 130.0 | U104 | 75.2 | 94.8 | 61.2 |
| Jan 30 | Siena | H | L 79–82 | +10.0 | W+7.0 | 128.0 | O161 | 125.3 | 130.1 | 63.0 |
Lafayette
Against the spread
Season
14-17
Home
4-11
Road
10-6
Last 10
5-5
avg cover −3.1
Missed the spread in the last gameCovered 2 of 5 as a favoriteCovered 3 of 5 as an underdog
Over / under
Season
18-13
Home
9-6
Road
9-7
Last 10
4-6
avg vs total −2.9
Over 2 straightOver in 3 of 5 as a favoriteOver in 1 of 5 as an underdog
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3 | Holy Cross | H | L 77–82 | −4.5 | L−9.5 | 141.5 | O159 | 114.0 | 121.4 | 67.5 |
| Feb 28 | Army | H | W 83–77 | −3.0 | W+3.0 | 144.5 | O160 | 114.5 | 106.2 | 72.5 |
| Feb 25 | Colgate | A | W 70–69 | +8.5 | W+9.5 | 147.5 | U139 | 112.2 | 110.6 | 62.4 |
| Feb 22 | American | H | L 61–75 | +3.5 | L−10.5 | 141.0 | U136 | 103.5 | 127.3 | 58.9 |
| Feb 18 | Holy Cross | A | W 86–83 | +2.0 | W+5.0 | 139.5 | O169 | 120.3 | 116.1 | 71.5 |
| Feb 14 | Lehigh | H | L 69–78 | −1.0 | L−10.0 | 140.5 | O147 | 106.8 | 120.7 | 64.6 |
| Feb 11 | Loyola MD | H | L 54–68 | −3.0 | L−17.0 | 148.5 | U122 | 82.5 | 103.9 | 65.5 |
| Feb 7 | Army | A | W 63–60 | −1.0 | W+2.0 | 143.0 | U123 | 93.6 | 89.1 | 67.3 |
| Feb 4 | Navy | H | L 50–65 | +3.5 | L−11.5 | 141.5 | U115 | 78.7 | 102.3 | 63.5 |
| Jan 31 | American | A | W 67–65 | +5.5 | W+7.5 | 143.0 | U132 | 105.4 | 102.2 | 63.6 |
Records vs the closing line describe the past; ten games is a small sample.
Tale of the tape
national rank toned left for away, right for homeNiagaraLafayette
Efficiency
102.5
103.4
113.6
112.5
65.0
68.0
—
—
Shooting
50.5%
49.3%
50.5%
50.0%
33.7%
32.2%
72.2%
68.9%
26.6%
32.4%
Ball control & glass
18.9%
15.3%
16.6%
15.1%
24.8%
25.8%
32.9%
28.6%
10.4%
7.9%
9.7%
10.5%
Style
40.5%
39.8%
45.0%
46.1%
10.1%
9.7%
60.0%
55.4%
37.6%
24.7%
Roster
3.67
1.53
6'3.4"
6'4.4"
10.2%
83.1%
Offseason
roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model inputNiagara
Returning minutes: 10.2%Returning production: 8.3%
Lost
- Reggie Prudhomme 26.4 mpg, 6.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Justin Hawkins 26.2 mpg, 8.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Justin Page 21.1 mpg, 8.5 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Vice Zanki 20.3 mpg, 7.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Josiah Sabino 19.6 mpg, 6.6 ppg · transferred to Manhattan
- Will Shortt 19.5 mpg, 6.5 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
- Cole Farrell from Long Beach St · 20.7 mpg, 6.4 ppg last season
- Logan Woods from Wright St · 18.4 mpg, 5.3 ppg last season
- Bastien Rieber from Fresno St · 16.4 mpg, 4.0 ppg last season
- Tae Blackshear from Youngstown St · 13.7 mpg, 6.3 ppg last season
- Vukasin Todorovic from Green Bay · 5.9 mpg, 1.7 ppg last season
- Brian Angeletti no D1 minutes last season
Returns 10% of last season's minutes; lost 5 of its top 5 (1 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).
Lafayette
Returning minutes: 83.1%Returning production: 82.8%
Lost
- Mark Butler 33.9 mpg, 10.7 ppg · transferred to Rider
Added
- Justin Vander Baan no D1 minutes last season
- Beckett Currie no D1 minutes last season
- TJ Berger no D1 minutes last season
- Chris Rubayo no D1 minutes last season
- Luka Savicevic no D1 minutes last season
No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.
Returns 83% of last season's minutes; lost 1 of its top 5 (1 transferred). Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026).
Head-to-head
this season and lastNo meetings the last two seasons.
The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.
What these numbers mean: line shopping.