CBB Matchups
Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.
College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.
Non-conferenceNeutral siteThe Palestra, Philadelphia, PACathedral Classic
La Salle
Efficiency #256
2025-26: 9-23 · 5-14 conf
vs
Bucknell
Efficiency #334
2025-26: 10-23 · 7-13 conf
Fri, Nov 27 · 3:30 PM ET
72.7
win 63%
Projected
68.9
win 37%
No line posted yet.
Model: LAS −3.9 · total 141.6 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3
Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.
How the projection is built
each step, from an average D-I game to this oneProjected total
Average D-I game
148.2
PaceAdjusted tempo: Bucknell 68.1, La Salle 67.3 → 67.0 possessions
−2.8
Bucknell offense vs La Salle defense
−3.9
La Salle offense vs Bucknell defense
0.0
Projected total
141.6
Axis starts at 135 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Projected margin
Even game
0.0
Bucknell offense vs La Salle defense
−3.9
La Salle offense vs Bucknell defense
0.0
La Salle by 3.9
3.9
La Salle side ◂▸ Bucknell side
Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1: the total steps add to 141.5 against a projected 141.6. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help Bucknell.
Pace & total
possessions per 40 minutesTempo, possessions per 40 minutes
Projected possessions: 67.0, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, Bucknell is the faster team (66.9, #247 of 365) and La Salle the slower (66.4, #280). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).
Projected possessions
67.0
per team, 40 min
Projected total
141.6
model
Projected team totals
72.7 / 68.9
La Salle / Bucknell
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
67.3#269
La Salle
68.1#202
Bucknell
How this game plays
what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meetAdvantageLa Salle
Where La Salle struggles: shooting
La Salle shoots an effective 45.4% (#357); Bucknell allows 54.7% (#323). Expect about 49.6%, 1.7 points below an average D1 matchup — worth roughly -2.3 points per 100 possessions.
Watch for noise
3-point caution
A notable season 3-point number here (Bucknell, La Salle, Bucknell's defense, La Salle's defense) is close to a coin flip going forward — the study's model of next-game 3P% barely beats guessing the D1 average. Shot volume is what actually carries: expect La Salle at about 37.1% of its shots from three, Bucknell about 43.9%.
TurnoversLa Salle
La Salle turns it over
Projected turnover rate of 18.3% is worth roughly -1.9 points per 100 possessions against La Salle's offense.
AdvantageBucknell
Where Bucknell struggles: ball control
Bucknell turns it over on 19.0% of possessions (#320); La Salle forces turnovers on 17.1% of opponent possessions (#137). Expect about 18.3%, 1.5 points above an average D1 matchup — worth roughly -1.8 points per 100 possessions.
GlassLa Salle
La Salle owns the glass
Projected offensive rebound rate of 33.1% is worth roughly +1.7 points per 100 possessions for La Salle's offense.
ClashLa Salle
Style clash: 3-point volume
La Salle rarely shoots threes (31.5% of its shots); Bucknell lets opponents take 45.7% of their shots from three (D1 average 39.5%). Expect about 37.1% — the offense's habit usually carries a bit more weight (0.80 vs 0.64).
La Salle has the ball
OffenseBucknell allowsvs D1 avg
45.4% #357
54.7% #323
-2.3 pt/100
18.2% #284
17.9% #99
-1.9 pt/100
33.7% #75
31.3% #216
+1.7 pt/100
37.5% #113
35.3% #186
+0.2 pt/100
72.5% #189
—
+0.0 pt/100
La Salle net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: -2.4 pts/100
Bucknell has the ball
OffenseLa Salle allowsvs D1 avg
48.5% #304
55.0% #329
+0.4 pt/100
19.0% #320
17.1% #137
-1.8 pt/100
27.0% #295
32.4% #274
-0.9 pt/100
29.8% #314
31.5% #97
-0.6 pt/100
76.8% #35
—
+0.4 pt/100
Bucknell net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: -2.6 pts/100
Shot diet
Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbersLa Salleoffense vsBucknelldefense
Share of shots by zone
La Salle shoots
40.6
7.5
20.5
31.4
Bucknell allows
33.5
6.5
13.6
46.4
D-I average
38.5
6.4
15.8
39.3
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 52.4%#346 | 60.3%#245 | 58.6% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 33.9%#305 | 45.5%#309 | 39.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 36.7%#242 | 40.7%#268 | 38.0% |
| Three | 30.0%#342 | 37.0%#344 | 33.7% |
Bucknelloffense vsLa Salledefense
Share of shots by zone
Bucknell shoots
39.5
6.2
12.0
42.2
La Salle allows
38.6
5.5
13.5
42.4
D-I average
38.5
6.4
15.8
39.3
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 57.8%#201 | 61.1%#271 | 58.6% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 36.2%#265 | 42.0%#231 | 39.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 32.5%#336 | 40.1%#246 | 38.0% |
| Three | 30.6%#328 | 36.5%#324 | 33.7% |
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three
Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).
Shot volume
Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbersLa Salle
+1.4extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#122 of 365
Off reb %
33.7%
#75
Def reb %
67.6%
#274
Turnover %
18.2%
#284
Forced TO %
17.1%
#137
FT rate
37.5%
#113
FT allowed
31.5%
#97
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+1.1
Defensive rebounding−0.6
Ball security−1.0
Forcing turnovers+0.3
Foul shots drawn+0.6
Foul shots allowed+1.0
Bucknell
−3.4extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#310 of 365
Off reb %
27.0%
#295
Def reb %
68.7%
#216
Turnover %
19.0%
#320
Forced TO %
17.9%
#99
FT rate
29.8%
#314
FT allowed
35.3%
#186
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−1.1
Defensive rebounding−0.2
Ball security−1.5
Forcing turnovers+0.8
Foul shots drawn−1.3
Foul shots allowed0.0
La Salle has more extra scoring chances per game: +1.4 (#122 of 365) to Bucknell’s −3.4 (#310).
Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).
Rotation
La Salle2025-26 numbers
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ashton Walker | G | Fr | 6'5" | 32-21 | 27.6 | 8.2 | 3.8 | 3.1 | 1.6 | 44.4% | 31.6% | 2.4 | 65.3% | 22.1% | |
| 99 | Rob Dockery | G | So | 6'6" | 32-24 | 27.3 | 12.5 | 6.1 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 51.7% | 25.0% | 1.8 | 77.2% | 29.9% | |
| 2 | Jaeden Marshall | G | Sr | 6'5" | 25-18 | 27.7 | 12.0 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 46.3% | 33.8% | 5.4 | 86.2% | 27.2% | |
| 10 | Jaden Johnson | G | So | 6'2" | 19-19 | 29.9 | 6.3 | 2.4 | 4.1 | 1.4 | 32.1% | 21.7% | 1.2 | 65.0% | 19.1% | |
| 4 | Truth Harris | G | Sr | 6'2" | 23-13 | 23.9 | 6.5 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 40.7% | 27.5% | 4.7 | 90.3% | 20.4% | |
| 5 | Josiah Harris | F | Sr | 6'9" | 27-20 | 19.8 | 8.4 | 5.2 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 45.5% | — | 0.0 | 70.1% | 30.3% | |
| 24 | Jerome Brewer Jr. | F | Jr | 6'9" | 19-15 | 26.7 | 11.2 | 4.2 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 53.2% | 30.6% | 3.3 | 75.7% | 25.1% | |
| 3 | Eric Acker | G | Jr | 6'2" | 26-10 | 19.0 | 5.8 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 47.8% | 36.4% | 2.1 | 69.0% | 23.0% | |
| 27 | Edwin Daniel | F | Jr | 6'9" | 31-4 | 14.4 | 3.9 | 3.5 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 49.5% | 0.0% | 0.1 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 0 | Justin Archer | F | Sr | 6'7" | 12-4 | 19.7 | 6.3 | 4.5 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 54.5% | — | 0.0 | 65.9% | 17.7% | |
| 12 | Damon Strand | G | Sr | 6'3" | 22-3 | 10.6 | 2.9 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 40.2% | 27.7% | 2.1 | 90.9% | 19.6% | |
| 25 | Bowyn Beatty | F | Jr | 7'0" | 10-3 | 11.0 | 0.8 | 2.5 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 23.5% | 0.0% | 0.3 | 0.0% | 14.4% | |
| 7 | Noah Collier | F | Sr | 6'9" | 3-3 | 14.0 | 3.7 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 41.7% | — | 0.0 | 50.0% | 20.6% | |
| 13 | Max Lipacis | F | Jr | 6'7" | 6-0 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | — | 0.0 | 0.0% | 6.1% | |
| 28 | Arlan Masharaliyev | G | Fr | 6'0" | 5-0 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.6 | 50.0% | 28.0% | |
| 11 | Josue Grullon | G | Sr | 6'5" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
Bucknell2025-26 numbers
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | Achile Spadone | G | Sr | 6'4" | 33-33 | 34.8 | 12.4 | 6.1 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 47.3% | 29.7% | 4.4 | 79.2% | 23.9% | |
| 2 | Jayden Williams | G | So | 5'10" | 33-33 | 32.6 | 7.5 | 2.9 | 4.0 | 1.8 | 39.4% | 31.0% | 3.5 | 82.8% | 18.7% | |
| 22 | Amon Dorries | C | Fr | 6'11" | 33-32 | 32.5 | 16.2 | 4.4 | 1.4 | 2.7 | 57.8% | 33.3% | 2.5 | 78.8% | 29.2% | |
| 3 | Aleksander Pachucki | G | So | 6'5" | 33-10 | 20.7 | 5.9 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 53.9% | 35.9% | 3.5 | 69.6% | 17.5% | |
| 21 | Pat Curtin | G | Fr | 6'3" | 27-19 | 25.1 | 12.8 | 4.3 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 47.8% | 26.9% | 4.4 | 80.2% | 33.4% | |
| 4 | Ruot Bijiek | F | Sr | 6'9" | 12-11 | 28.8 | 11.8 | 5.2 | 0.8 | 2.6 | 44.2% | 28.4% | 6.2 | 85.4% | 29.2% | |
| 1 | Jacob Meachem | G | Fr | 5'8" | 30-0 | 10.4 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 27.4% | 25.0% | 0.4 | 77.3% | 17.5% | |
| 23 | Grgur Brcic | C | Jr | 6'10" | 18-8 | 16.9 | 4.3 | 4.8 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 56.9% | — | 0.0 | 46.2% | 16.2% | |
| 10 | Brandon McCreesh | G | Jr | 6'4" | 8-8 | 27.6 | 7.4 | 3.1 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 52.9% | 37.5% | 4.0 | 62.5% | 16.2% | |
| 0 | Patrick O'Brien | F | Jr | 6'8" | 21-3 | 9.8 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 39.7% | 16.7% | 0.9 | 70.4% | 15.1% | |
| 5 | Josh Fulton | G | Sr | 6'6" | 8-0 | 10.9 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 75.0% | 0.0% | 0.1 | 85.7% | 12.7% | |
| 7 | Matt Lange | G | So | 6'2" | 8-0 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 150.0% | 100.0% | 0.1 | 25.0% | 11.0% | |
| 32 | Kellen Welch | F | So | 6'7" | 10-0 | 1.9 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 28.6% | 0.0% | 0.2 | 50.0% | 23.9% | |
| 11 | Brady Muller | F | Sr | 6'4" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
La Salle2025-26 numbers
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ashton Walker | G | Fr | 6'5" | 32-21 | 27.6 | 8.2 | 3.8 | 3.1 | 1.6 | 44.4% | 31.6% | 2.4 | 65.3% | 22.1% | |
| 99 | Rob Dockery | G | So | 6'6" | 32-24 | 27.3 | 12.5 | 6.1 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 51.7% | 25.0% | 1.8 | 77.2% | 29.9% | |
| 2 | Jaeden Marshall | G | Sr | 6'5" | 25-18 | 27.7 | 12.0 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 46.3% | 33.8% | 5.4 | 86.2% | 27.2% | |
| 10 | Jaden Johnson | G | So | 6'2" | 19-19 | 29.9 | 6.3 | 2.4 | 4.1 | 1.4 | 32.1% | 21.7% | 1.2 | 65.0% | 19.1% | |
| 4 | Truth Harris | G | Sr | 6'2" | 23-13 | 23.9 | 6.5 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 40.7% | 27.5% | 4.7 | 90.3% | 20.4% | |
| 5 | Josiah Harris | F | Sr | 6'9" | 27-20 | 19.8 | 8.4 | 5.2 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 45.5% | — | 0.0 | 70.1% | 30.3% | |
| 24 | Jerome Brewer Jr. | F | Jr | 6'9" | 19-15 | 26.7 | 11.2 | 4.2 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 53.2% | 30.6% | 3.3 | 75.7% | 25.1% | |
| 3 | Eric Acker | G | Jr | 6'2" | 26-10 | 19.0 | 5.8 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 47.8% | 36.4% | 2.1 | 69.0% | 23.0% | |
| 27 | Edwin Daniel | F | Jr | 6'9" | 31-4 | 14.4 | 3.9 | 3.5 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 49.5% | 0.0% | 0.1 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 0 | Justin Archer | F | Sr | 6'7" | 12-4 | 19.7 | 6.3 | 4.5 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 54.5% | — | 0.0 | 65.9% | 17.7% | |
| 12 | Damon Strand | G | Sr | 6'3" | 22-3 | 10.6 | 2.9 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 40.2% | 27.7% | 2.1 | 90.9% | 19.6% | |
| 25 | Bowyn Beatty | F | Jr | 7'0" | 10-3 | 11.0 | 0.8 | 2.5 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 23.5% | 0.0% | 0.3 | 0.0% | 14.4% | |
| 7 | Noah Collier | F | Sr | 6'9" | 3-3 | 14.0 | 3.7 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 41.7% | — | 0.0 | 50.0% | 20.6% | |
| 13 | Max Lipacis | F | Jr | 6'7" | 6-0 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | — | 0.0 | 0.0% | 6.1% | |
| 28 | Arlan Masharaliyev | G | Fr | 6'0" | 5-0 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.6 | 50.0% | 28.0% | |
| 11 | Josue Grullon | G | Sr | 6'5" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
Trends
Last 10 games of 2025-26La Salle
Against the spread
Season
15-16
Home
10-3
Road
5-9
Last 10
5-5
avg cover −0.2
Missed the spread 2 straightCovered 5 of 10 as an underdogCovered 3 of 5 with a line of 10+
Over / under
Season
14-17
Home
7-6
Road
5-9
Last 10
5-5
avg vs total +5.1
Over 5 straightOver in 5 of 10 as an underdogOver in 2 of 5 with a line of 10+
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11 | St Bonaventure | N | L 80–99 | +5.5 | L−13.5 | 145.5 | O179 | 112.3 | 138.9 | 71.3 |
| Mar 7 | Saint Joseph's | A | L 76–88 | +10.5 | L−1.5 | 142.5 | O164 | 110.5 | 128.0 | 68.8 |
| Mar 4 | Fordham | H | W 87–84 | +2.5 | W+5.5 | 131.5 | O171 | 128.7 | 124.3 | 67.6 |
| Mar 1 | Davidson | A | L 64–71 | +11.0 | W+4.0 | 133.5 | O135 | 95.0 | 105.3 | 67.4 |
| Feb 24 | G Washington | H | L 77–104 | +7.5 | L−19.5 | 148.0 | O181 | 106.3 | 143.5 | 72.5 |
| Feb 21 | Rhode Island | H | W 59–46 | +4.0 | W+17.0 | 137.0 | U105 | 95.8 | 74.7 | 61.6 |
| Feb 18 | Duquesne | A | L 61–62 | +11.0 | W+10.0 | 146.0 | U123 | 88.1 | 89.5 | 69.2 |
| Feb 11 | VCU | H | L 68–77 | +13.0 | W+4.0 | 147.0 | U145 | 103.0 | 116.7 | 66.0 |
| Feb 7 | #19Saint Louis | A | L 58–82 | +23.5 | L−0.5 | 154.0 | U140 | 82.0 | 115.9 | 70.8 |
| Feb 3 | Loyola Chicago | A | L 61–71 | +2.5 | L−7.5 | 139.0 | U132 | 89.8 | 104.5 | 68.0 |
Bucknell
Against the spread
Season
14-19
Home
5-9
Road
7-10
Last 10
4-6
avg cover −3.1
Covered 2 straightCovered 3 of 8 as an underdog
Over / under
Season
12-20-1
Home
5-8-1
Road
7-10
Last 10
4-5-1
avg vs total −0.8
Over in the last gameOver in 4 of 8 as an underdog, 1 push
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5 | Navy | A | L 69–74 | +14.5 | W+9.5 | 132.5 | O143 | 110.1 | 118.1 | 62.7 |
| Mar 3 | Army | H | W 65–55 | −2.0 | W+8.0 | 144.0 | U120 | 97.2 | 82.2 | 66.9 |
| Feb 28 | Lehigh | A | L 79–89 | +4.5 | L−5.5 | 139.5 | O168 | 116.3 | 131.1 | 67.9 |
| Feb 25 | Army | A | W 75–73 | +3.5 | W+5.5 | 142.5 | O148 | 103.6 | 100.8 | 72.4 |
| Feb 22 | Holy Cross | H | L 63–72 | −2.5 | L−11.5 | 141.5 | U135 | 95.7 | 109.4 | 65.8 |
| Feb 18 | American | H | L 57–75 | +3.0 | L−15.0 | 140.5 | U132 | 88.1 | 115.9 | 64.7 |
| Feb 14 | Boston U | A | L 69–82 | +5.5 | L−7.5 | 137.0 | O151 | 105.6 | 125.5 | 65.3 |
| Feb 9 | Navy | H | L 60–76 | +6.5 | L−9.5 | 136.0 | P136 | 86.7 | 109.9 | 69.2 |
| Feb 7 | Colgate | H | L 59–78 | +5.0 | L−14.0 | 141.5 | U137 | 80.4 | 106.3 | 73.4 |
| Feb 4 | American | A | W 60–59 | +8.0 | W+9.0 | 142.0 | U119 | 101.4 | 99.7 | 59.2 |
Records vs the closing line describe the past; ten games is a small sample.
Tale of the tape
national rank toned left for away, right for homeLa SalleBucknell
Efficiency
105.2
101.2
110.0
111.7
67.3
68.1
—
—
Shooting
45.4%
48.5%
45.6%
50.4%
30.0%
30.6%
72.5%
76.8%
37.5%
29.8%
Ball control & glass
18.2%
19.0%
17.1%
17.9%
33.7%
27.0%
32.4%
31.3%
10.1%
11.1%
12.2%
11.5%
Style
31.5%
42.7%
46.1%
43.4%
11.4%
9.9%
56.0%
54.0%
34.8%
24.0%
Roster
2.85
2.30
6'5.5"
6'4.5"
96.7%
92.5%
Offseason
roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model inputLa Salle
Returning minutes: 96.7%Returning production: 97.7%
Lost
- Nas Hart 6.6 mpg, 1.4 ppg · transferred to Quinnipiac
Added
- Josue Grullon no D1 minutes last season
No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.
Returns 97% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026).
Bucknell
Returning minutes: 92.5%Returning production: 96.3%
Lost
- Quin Berger 15.1 mpg, 2.8 ppg · transferred to Miami
Added
- Brady Muller no D1 minutes last season
No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.
Returns 93% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026).
Head-to-head
this season and lastNo meetings the last two seasons.
The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.
What these numbers mean: line shopping.