CBB Matchups

Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.

College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.
Non-conferenceBurr Gymnasium, Washington, DC
Stetson
Efficiency #322
2025-26: 12-21 · 8-12 conf
@
Howard
Efficiency #160
2025-26: 24-11 · 13-3 conf
Thu, Nov 12 · TBD
68.8
win 17%
Projected
79.8
win 83%
No line posted yet.
Model: HOW −11.0 · total 148.6 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3
Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.

How the projection is built

each step, from an average D-I game to this one
Projected total
Average D-I game
148.2
PaceAdjusted tempo: Howard 69.3, Stetson 67.9 → 68.9 possessions
+1.3
Howard offense vs Stetson defense
+3.1
Stetson offense vs Howard defense
−4.0
Projected total
148.6
Axis starts at 146 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Projected margin
Even game
0.0
Howard offense vs Stetson defense
+3.1
Stetson offense vs Howard defense
+4.0
Home court+2.9 points per 100 possessions to the home offense, −2.9 to the visitors
+4.0
Howard by 11.0
11.0
Stetson side ◂▸ Howard side

Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1: the margin steps add to +11.1 against +11.0. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help Howard.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 68.9, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, Howard is the faster team (69.2, #131 of 365) and Stetson the slower (67.9, #208). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
68.9
per team, 40 min
Projected total
148.6
model
Projected team totals
68.8 / 79.8
Stetson / Howard
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
67.9#216
Stetson
69.3#100
Howard

How this game plays

what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meet
AdvantageStetson
Where Stetson struggles: ball control
Stetson turns it over on 18.1% of possessions (#277); Howard forces turnovers on 20.7% of opponent possessions (#13). Expect about 20.1%, 3.3 points above an average D1 matchup — worth roughly -4.1 points per 100 possessions.
AdvantageHoward
Where Howard scores: the offensive glass
Howard rebounds 35.8% of its own misses (#28); Stetson lets opponents grab 31.8% of their own misses (#250). Expect about 34.9%, 4.4 points above an average D1 matchup — worth roughly +2.7 points per 100 possessions.
DefenseHoward
Howard's ball-hawking
Howard ranks #27 nationally in steal rate — one of the few defensive numbers that travels. Expect about 11.8% of Stetson's possessions to end in a steal against this defense.
Watch for noise
3-point caution
A notable season 3-point number here (Howard's defense) is close to a coin flip going forward — the study's model of next-game 3P% barely beats guessing the D1 average. Shot volume is what actually carries: expect Stetson at about 40.4% of its shots from three, Howard about 36.7%.
ClashStetson
Style clash: ball movement
Stetson assists on 58.5% of its made baskets; Howard breaks up passing offenses (assists on 47.9% allowed) (D1 average 52.4%). Expect about 53.4% — the offense's habit usually carries a bit more weight (0.65 vs 0.65).
ClashStetson
Style clash: 3-point volume
Stetson takes 44.7% of its shots from three; Howard runs teams off the line (34.4% of shots allowed from three) (D1 average 39.5%). Expect about 40.4% — the offense's habit usually carries a bit more weight (0.80 vs 0.64).
Stetson has the ball
OffenseHoward allowsvs D1 avg
53.1% #96
48.7% #53
-0.3 pt/100
18.1% #277
20.7% #13
-4.1 pt/100
26.6% #308
31.4% #223
-1.3 pt/100
32.4% #250
38.4% #270
+0.1 pt/100
69.2% #292
—
-0.3 pt/100
Stetson net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: -5.9 pts/100
Howard has the ball
OffenseStetson allowsvs D1 avg
50.9% #198
55.2% #338
+2.6 pt/100
19.3% #331
15.1% #271
-0.5 pt/100
35.8% #28
31.8% #250
+2.7 pt/100
43.4% #17
30.4% #71
+0.2 pt/100
74.0% #130
—
+0.1 pt/100
Howard net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +5.1 pts/100

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbers
Stetsonoffense vsHowarddefense
Share of shots by zone
Stetson shoots
Howard allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim59.7%#12656.1%#8858.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)40.0%#17135.8%#8539.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)41.4%#7431.5%#1338.0%
Three36.0%#5931.4%#4133.7%
Howardoffense vsStetsondefense
Share of shots by zone
Howard shoots
Stetson allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim52.7%#34563.8%#33858.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)31.8%#33435.7%#8339.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)38.7%#16042.3%#31238.0%
Three35.8%#6834.6%#22333.7%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbers
Stetson
−3.0extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#304 of 365
Off reb %
26.6%
#308
Def reb %
68.2%
#250
Turnover %
18.1%
#277
Forced TO %
15.1%
#271
FT rate
32.4%
#250
FT allowed
30.4%
#71
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−1.2
Defensive rebounding−0.4
Ball security−0.9
Forcing turnovers−1.1
Foul shots drawn−0.7
Foul shots allowed+1.2
Howard
+3.9extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#39 of 365
Off reb %
35.8%
#28
Def reb %
68.6%
#223
Turnover %
19.3%
#331
Forced TO %
20.7%
#13
FT rate
43.4%
#17
FT allowed
38.4%
#270
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+1.7
Defensive rebounding−0.3
Ball security−1.7
Forcing turnovers+2.8
Foul shots drawn+2.2
Foul shots allowed−0.8

Howard has more extra scoring chances per game: +3.9 (#39 of 365) to Stetson’s −3.0 (#304).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Stetson2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted Stetson's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%UsageStatus
1Ethan CopelandGJr6'2"33-3332.115.03.72.11.358.4%42.9%7.779.4%25.2%
32Jake JohnsonGSr6'5"32-2028.49.23.11.41.050.2%34.0%5.078.2%19.7%
3Calvin Sirmans IIIGJr5'8"32-2723.56.11.84.61.841.3%30.4%2.276.5%19.8%
9Collin KuhlFJr6'8"32-2923.513.16.30.71.566.2%37.5%0.361.8%28.5%
21Finley SheridanFJr6'10"29-2021.67.04.11.31.563.6%42.4%2.063.0%19.2%
13Alex DoyleFJr6'9"33-716.44.92.10.91.058.0%40.2%3.257.1%18.8%
0Jamie Phillips Jr.GSo6'5"17-1730.616.05.62.82.051.9%34.7%4.469.0%30.7%
12Matar DiopFJr6'10"31-912.82.82.80.20.649.3%20.0%0.242.9%16.3%
4Daniel MacgregorGSo6'0"20-318.74.81.93.82.040.9%33.3%1.182.1%21.7%
51Sean MorganGFr6'2"16-014.33.51.30.80.935.2%18.4%2.461.1%21.6%
15J.R. LeonardGFr6'4"22-010.03.71.00.10.241.1%24.3%1.744.4%26.5%
18Janusz RatowskiFFr6'11"25-07.62.21.70.30.664.5%33.3%0.163.6%17.5%
2Isaac JonesGSo6'1"8-02.60.50.50.40.40.0%0.0%0.366.7%25.7%
8Miller McGowanGFr6'1"8-02.60.50.00.00.30.0%0.0%0.6100.0%26.9%
20Ben GladieuxGFr6'7"6-02.30.80.70.00.550.0%0.0%0.250.0%31.5%
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.

Tale of the tape

national rank toned left for away, right for home
StetsonHoward
Efficiency
105.1
106.9
114.4
106.1
67.9
69.3
—
—
Shooting
53.1%
50.9%
52.5%
49.4%
36.0%
35.8%
69.2%
74.0%
32.4%
43.4%
Ball control & glass
18.1%
19.3%
15.1%
20.7%
26.6%
35.8%
31.8%
31.4%
11.5%
8.4%
7.7%
11.2%
Style
44.7%
34.7%
40.0%
41.5%
12.2%
16.4%
58.5%
60.3%
32.8%
26.1%
Roster
2.80
2.71
6'4.7"
6'4.2"
—
83.9%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Stetson
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted Stetson's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.

Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)

Howard
Returning minutes: 83.9%Returning production: 78.0%
Lost
  • Bryce Harris 32.3 mpg, 17.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
Nobody of note.

No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.

Returns 84% of last season's minutes; lost 1 of its top 5. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Head-to-head

this season and last
DateSeasonResult
Wed, Nov 192025-26Howard 60 – 64 Stetson

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.