CBB Matchups

Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.

College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.
Non-conferenceChesapeake Employers Insurance Arena, Baltimore, MD410 Invitational
Morgan St
Efficiency #349
2025-26: 14-16 · 10-5 conf
@
UMBC
Efficiency #147
2025-26: 24-9 · 17-2 conf
Thu, Nov 12 · 6:00 PM ET
68.5
win 11%
Projected
82.9
win 89%
No line posted yet.
Model: UMBC −14.3 · total 151.4 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3
Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.

How the projection is built

each step, from an average D-I game to this one
Projected total
Average D-I game
148.2
PaceAdjusted tempo: UMBC 67.5, Morgan St 70.3 → 69.5 possessions
+2.5
UMBC offense vs Morgan St defense
+5.5
Morgan St offense vs UMBC defense
−4.8
Projected total
151.4
Axis starts at 145 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Projected margin
Even game
0.0
UMBC offense vs Morgan St defense
+5.5
Morgan St offense vs UMBC defense
+4.8
Home court+2.9 points per 100 possessions to the home offense, −2.9 to the visitors
+4.0
UMBC by 14.3
14.3
Morgan St side ◂▸ UMBC side

Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help UMBC.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 69.5, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, Morgan St is the faster team (70.7, #64 of 365) and UMBC the slower (66.5, #267). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
69.5
per team, 40 min
Projected total
151.4
model
Projected team totals
68.5 / 82.9
Morgan St / UMBC
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
70.3#31
Morgan St
67.5#252
UMBC

How this game plays

what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meet
AdvantageMorgan St
Where Morgan St struggles: shooting
Morgan St shoots an effective 45.8% (#351); UMBC allows 49.4% (#79). Expect about 47.1%, 4.1 points below an average D1 matchup — worth roughly -5.9 points per 100 possessions.
AdvantageUMBC
Where UMBC scores: shooting
UMBC shoots an effective 54.1% (#64); Morgan St allows 51.7% (#194). Expect about 53.1%, 1.8 points above an average D1 matchup — worth roughly +2.6 points per 100 possessions.
TurnoversUMBC
UMBC protects the ball
Projected turnover rate of 15.0% is worth roughly +2.1 points per 100 possessions for UMBC's offense.
Watch for noise
3-point caution
A notable season 3-point number here (Morgan St's defense) is close to a coin flip going forward — the study's model of next-game 3P% barely beats guessing the D1 average. Shot volume is what actually carries: expect Morgan St at about 34.8% of its shots from three, UMBC about 34.0%.
ClashMorgan St
Strength vs strength: free-throw rate
Morgan St (#22 in free-throw rate) against UMBC (#10 in the same stat allowed) — both rank inside the national top 60. Expect about 33.1%. Historically UMBC's own number has carried a bit more weight in that exchange (0.50 vs 0.61).
ClashUMBC
Strength vs strength: 3-point shooting
UMBC (#55 in 3-point shooting) against Morgan St (#43 in the same stat allowed) — both rank inside the national top 60. Expect about 34.0%. Historically UMBC's own number has carried a bit more weight in that exchange (0.25 vs 0.16).
Morgan St has the ball
OffenseUMBC allowsvs D1 avg
45.8% #351
49.4% #79
-5.9 pt/100
17.8% #260
15.1% #285
+0.6 pt/100
30.7% #172
25.8% #18
-1.2 pt/100
42.7% #22
25.7% #10
-0.2 pt/100
74.3% #113
—
+0.2 pt/100
Morgan St net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: -6.6 pts/100
UMBC has the ball
OffenseMorgan St allowsvs D1 avg
54.1% #64
51.7% #194
+2.6 pt/100
14.0% #25
16.5% #184
+2.1 pt/100
24.9% #342
35.2% #341
-0.9 pt/100
34.1% #205
50.9% #363
+1.1 pt/100
76.0% #54
—
+0.3 pt/100
UMBC net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +5.3 pts/100

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbers
Morgan Stoffense vsUMBCdefense
Share of shots by zone
Morgan St shoots
UMBC allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim53.0%#34054.5%#5058.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)32.1%#32639.5%#17539.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)35.1%#28936.5%#12138.0%
Three31.7%#29532.7%#9833.7%
UMBCoffense vsMorgan Stdefense
Share of shots by zone
UMBC shoots
Morgan St allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim60.8%#10058.6%#16858.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)47.8%#2526.9%#539.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)38.5%#17144.9%#34938.0%
Three36.1%#5531.5%#4333.7%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbers
Morgan St
−4.3extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#335 of 365
Off reb %
30.7%
#172
Def reb %
64.8%
#341
Turnover %
17.8%
#260
Forced TO %
16.5%
#184
FT rate
42.7%
#22
FT allowed
50.9%
#363
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+0.1
Defensive rebounding−1.5
Ball security−0.7
Forcing turnovers−0.2
Foul shots drawn+2.0
Foul shots allowed−4.0
UMBC
+2.7extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#64 of 365
Off reb %
24.9%
#342
Def reb %
74.2%
#18
Turnover %
14.0%
#25
Forced TO %
15.1%
#285
FT rate
34.1%
#205
FT allowed
25.7%
#10
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−1.8
Defensive rebounding+1.5
Ball security+1.9
Forcing turnovers−1.1
Foul shots drawn−0.2
Foul shots allowed+2.4

UMBC has more extra scoring chances per game: +2.7 (#64 of 365) to Morgan St’s −4.3 (#335).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Morgan St2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted Morgan St's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%UsageStatus
3Rob LawsonGSr5'11"30-2232.812.83.64.02.541.8%29.3%4.481.7%27.0%
2Elijah DavisGSr6'1"26-2634.913.83.35.92.645.9%21.7%0.972.5%25.5%
0Christian MeeksGJr6'6"30-2728.65.95.80.81.056.1%22.2%0.362.0%11.9%
1Alfred Worrell Jr.GSr6'4"30-2628.517.43.81.12.049.5%36.3%7.488.5%34.0%
55Eugene AlvinFJr6'7"29-1419.37.33.60.40.853.7%38.4%2.560.3%21.5%
52Walter Peggs Jr.GSr6'4"28-619.38.82.00.70.750.7%36.7%4.681.6%25.3%
21Christian OliverCSr6'10"26-914.34.33.00.40.557.3%22.2%0.367.9%16.6%
7Marland HarrisFSr6'9"20-612.93.93.80.30.854.7%—0.069.0%17.3%
4David BumpassGFr6'4"22-09.13.21.00.20.440.6%16.7%1.159.4%24.4%
22Manok LualFJr6'9"20-47.71.80.80.10.550.0%20.0%0.347.4%16.6%
42Dallas JamesCSr7'1"21-96.41.61.50.01.250.0%—0.072.7%23.4%
5Matar WadeFSo6'8"13-08.20.91.80.20.745.5%0.0%0.1100.0%11.3%
10Breon BarnettGFr6'1"13-03.40.30.50.20.211.1%0.0%0.2100.0%15.9%
13Trent EdwardsFJr6'8"2-117.03.53.50.00.542.9%0.0%0.533.3%17.0%
32Jayden SockaFSr6'9"6-02.70.70.50.50.033.3%—0.033.3%20.5%
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.

Tale of the tape

national rank toned left for away, right for home
Morgan StUMBC
Efficiency
102.0
109.3
115.6
108.0
70.3
67.5
—
—
Shooting
45.8%
54.1%
44.9%
54.1%
31.7%
36.1%
74.3%
76.0%
42.7%
34.1%
Ball control & glass
17.8%
14.0%
16.5%
15.1%
30.7%
24.9%
35.2%
25.8%
9.4%
7.8%
10.4%
6.4%
Style
35.2%
38.8%
37.2%
44.0%
18.3%
12.7%
52.2%
44.8%
32.6%
29.7%
Roster
3.58
2.89
6'4.3"
6'5.3"
—
83.9%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Morgan St
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted Morgan St's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.

Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)

UMBC
Returning minutes: 83.9%Returning production: 82.9%
Lost
  • DJ Armstrong Jr. 32.4 mpg, 13.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Regimantas Ciunys no D1 minutes last season

No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.

Returns 84% of last season's minutes; lost 1 of its top 5. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Head-to-head

this season and last
DateSeasonResult
Tue, Nov 112025-26UMBC 81 – 79 Morgan St

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.