CBB Matchups
Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.
College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.
Non-conferencePan American Center, Las Cruces, NM
UTEP
Efficiency #279
2025-26: 11-20 · 7-13 conf
@
New Mexico St
Efficiency #178
2025-26: 16-16 · 9-13 conf
Thu, Nov 19 · TBD
66.9
win 25%
Projected
74.6
win 75%
No line posted yet.
Model: NMSU −7.7 · total 141.5 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3
Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.
How the projection is built
each step, from an average D-I game to this oneProjected total
Average D-I game
148.2
PaceAdjusted tempo: New Mexico St 67.8, UTEP 66.9 → 66.4 possessions
−4.1
New Mexico St offense vs UTEP defense
+0.6
UTEP offense vs New Mexico St defense
−3.3
Projected total
141.5
Axis starts at 135 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Projected margin
Even game
0.0
New Mexico St offense vs UTEP defense
+0.6
UTEP offense vs New Mexico St defense
+3.3
Home court+2.9 points per 100 possessions to the home offense, −2.9 to the visitors
+3.8
New Mexico St by 7.7
7.7
UTEP side ◂▸ New Mexico St side
Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1: the total steps add to 141.4 against a projected 141.5. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help New Mexico St.
Pace & total
possessions per 40 minutesTempo, possessions per 40 minutes
Projected possessions: 66.4, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, New Mexico St is the faster team (67.3, #233 of 365) and UTEP the slower (66.0, #296). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).
Projected possessions
66.4
per team, 40 min
Projected total
141.5
model
Projected team totals
66.9 / 74.6
UTEP / New Mexico St
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
66.9#294
UTEP
67.8#224
New Mexico St
How this game plays
what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meetAdvantageUTEP
Where UTEP struggles: shooting
UTEP shoots an effective 48.3% (#309); New Mexico St allows 48.7% (#52). Expect about 48.2%, 3.1 points below an average D1 matchup — worth roughly -4.4 points per 100 possessions.
Pace
Half-court grind
New Mexico St averages 67.3 possessions per 40, UTEP 66.0. Slower teams pull the pace toward themselves more than fast teams push it (0.80 vs 0.66 in five seasons of games), so expect about 66 — more possessions mean more points in the total and more chances for the better team to separate.
AdvantageNew Mexico St
Where New Mexico St struggles: shooting
New Mexico St shoots an effective 48.5% (#302); UTEP allows 51.5% (#187). Expect about 49.8%, 1.5 points below an average D1 matchup — worth roughly -2.1 points per 100 possessions.
GlassUTEP
UTEP gets out-rebounded
Projected offensive rebound rate of 27.4% is worth roughly -1.8 points per 100 possessions against UTEP's offense.
ClashUTEP
Style match: ball movement
UTEP creates off the dribble (assists on 48.0% of its baskets); New Mexico St breaks up passing offenses (assists on 47.8% allowed) (D1 average 52.4%). Expect about 46.5% — both habits push the same way.
GlassNew Mexico St
New Mexico St owns the glass
Projected offensive rebound rate of 33.1% is worth roughly +1.6 points per 100 possessions for New Mexico St's offense.
UTEP has the ball
OffenseNew Mexico St allowsvs D1 avg
48.3% #309
48.7% #52
-4.4 pt/100
17.4% #230
14.7% #313
+1.2 pt/100
26.2% #319
30.3% #175
-1.8 pt/100
33.4% #227
44.2% #346
+0.6 pt/100
70.4% #260
—
-0.2 pt/100
UTEP net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: -4.6 pts/100
New Mexico St has the ball
OffenseUTEP allowsvs D1 avg
48.5% #302
51.5% #187
-2.1 pt/100
15.0% #68
18.0% #98
+0.3 pt/100
32.5% #105
32.8% #293
+1.6 pt/100
34.9% #186
42.0% #321
+0.5 pt/100
73.5% #153
—
+0.1 pt/100
New Mexico St net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +0.4 pts/100
Shot diet
Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbersUTEPoffense vsNew Mexico Stdefense
Share of shots by zone
UTEP shoots
28.6
9.0
22.3
40.1
New Mexico St allows
36.4
9.5
13.0
41.1
D-I average
38.5
6.4
15.8
39.3
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 61.3%#85 | 58.8%#180 | 58.6% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 36.4%#259 | 37.1%#113 | 39.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 31.7%#342 | 27.5%#2 | 38.0% |
| Three | 33.9%#178 | 32.4%#83 | 33.7% |
New Mexico Stoffense vsUTEPdefense
Share of shots by zone
New Mexico St shoots
32.3
7.7
20.9
39.1
UTEP allows
38.2
11.2
13.4
37.2
D-I average
38.5
6.4
15.8
39.3
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 56.0%#272 | 58.8%#178 | 58.6% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 40.5%#165 | 40.7%#204 | 39.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 39.6%#127 | 42.0%#302 | 38.0% |
| Three | 32.4%#257 | 34.0%#182 | 33.7% |
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three
Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).
Shot volume
Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbersUTEP
−3.8extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#325 of 365
Off reb %
26.2%
#319
Def reb %
67.2%
#293
Turnover %
17.4%
#230
Forced TO %
18.0%
#98
FT rate
33.4%
#227
FT allowed
42.0%
#321
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−1.4
Defensive rebounding−0.7
Ball security−0.4
Forcing turnovers+0.9
Foul shots drawn−0.4
Foul shots allowed−1.7
New Mexico St
−1.7extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#262 of 365
Off reb %
32.5%
#105
Def reb %
69.7%
#175
Turnover %
15.0%
#68
Forced TO %
14.7%
#313
FT rate
34.9%
#186
FT allowed
44.2%
#346
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+0.7
Defensive rebounding+0.1
Ball security+1.2
Forcing turnovers−1.4
Foul shots drawn0.0
Foul shots allowed−2.3
New Mexico St has more extra scoring chances per game: −1.7 (#262 of 365) to UTEP’s −3.8 (#325).
Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).
Rotation
UTEP2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted UTEP's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 | Kaseem Watson | F | Jr | 6'9" | 31-28 | 31.4 | 12.5 | 5.0 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 47.7% | 38.2% | 4.9 | 81.7% | 26.3% | |
| 15 | Jamal West Jr. | F | Sr | 6'6" | 31-31 | 31.1 | 14.5 | 6.6 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 56.4% | 29.6% | 0.9 | 66.3% | 27.1% | |
| 1 | KJ Thomas | G | So | 6'1" | 31-24 | 28.5 | 5.8 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 44.9% | 25.4% | 2.0 | 73.1% | 15.7% | |
| 33 | Elijah Jones | F | Jr | 6'8" | 31-31 | 28.1 | 13.1 | 5.4 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 55.4% | 38.6% | 4.1 | 69.2% | 26.9% | |
| 4 | Caleb Blackwell | G | Jr | 6'1" | 28-27 | 30.4 | 10.6 | 2.6 | 2.9 | 1.7 | 50.0% | 36.4% | 4.7 | 69.6% | 23.3% | |
| 23 | Cassius Brooks | G | Sr | 6'0" | 30-4 | 13.8 | 2.8 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 43.7% | 31.6% | 0.6 | 80.8% | 14.8% | |
| 11 | Trey Horton III | G | Jr | 6'5" | 25-4 | 15.2 | 3.3 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 39.8% | 27.4% | 2.9 | 61.5% | 18.0% | |
| 7 | LA Hayes | G | Jr | 6'5" | 27-1 | 11.2 | 4.3 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 42.7% | 26.3% | 1.4 | 73.9% | 25.6% | |
| 25 | Mouhamed Mbaye | C | Jr | 6'10" | 24-0 | 7.0 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 40.0% | — | 0.0 | 47.1% | 9.5% | |
| 5 | Tyreese Watson | G | Sr | 6'4" | 7-5 | 23.9 | 8.0 | 1.9 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 38.7% | 29.4% | 2.4 | 60.0% | 29.7% | |
| 0 | David Tubek | F | Jr | 6'7" | 12-0 | 8.8 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 43.8% | 33.3% | 1.3 | 62.5% | 27.4% | |
| 3 | Bobby Montgomery Jr. | G | Fr | 6'5" | 16-0 | 5.1 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 42.9% | 0.0% | 0.2 | 14.3% | 15.6% | |
| 6 | C.J. Smith | F | So | 6'7" | 11-0 | 7.4 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 38.2% | 33.3% | 0.8 | 75.0% | 18.2% | |
| 2 | Jordan Hernandez | G | Jr | 5'11" | 7-0 | 4.6 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0% | — | 0.0 | 100.0% | 8.5% |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
New Mexico St2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted New Mexico St's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Jemel Jones | G | Sr | 6'4" | 32-30 | 28.4 | 17.8 | 4.4 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 48.4% | 37.2% | 4.3 | 83.5% | 36.9% | |
| 0 | Julius Mims | F | Sr | 6'9" | 31-31 | 27.5 | 10.6 | 8.4 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 59.7% | 31.3% | 1.0 | 64.6% | 20.9% | |
| 9 | Anthony Wrzeszcz | G | Sr | 6'4" | 32-26 | 24.6 | 7.4 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 49.5% | 32.9% | 5.2 | 85.0% | 18.6% | |
| 4 | Jae'Coby Osborne | F | So | 6'6" | 32-20 | 23.3 | 6.0 | 4.9 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 55.9% | 15.8% | 0.6 | 59.3% | 15.3% | |
| 1 | Gabe Pickens | G | So | 6'0" | 31-24 | 20.8 | 4.5 | 1.6 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 42.5% | 28.6% | 1.6 | 66.0% | 18.3% | |
| 8 | Jayland Randall | G | Sr | 6'5" | 32-1 | 19.9 | 8.9 | 3.1 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 44.4% | 31.3% | 4.0 | 82.9% | 27.6% | |
| 11 | Elijah Elliott | G | Sr | 6'1" | 31-7 | 18.6 | 8.3 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 41.6% | 31.6% | 3.7 | 77.1% | 31.6% | |
| 5 | Chris Terrell | G | Sr | 6'0" | 31-1 | 12.8 | 4.2 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 0.8 | 51.4% | 43.2% | 1.4 | 78.3% | 21.4% | |
| 3 | Kyrese Mullen | F | Sr | 6'7" | 26-4 | 14.0 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 38.8% | 26.5% | 1.3 | 58.0% | 22.1% | |
| 24 | Cyr Malonga | C | Jr | 6'11" | 24-16 | 11.6 | 3.7 | 2.5 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 67.3% | — | 0.0 | 47.8% | 17.8% | |
| 44 | Augustine Ekwe | C | Fr | 6'9" | 23-0 | 10.4 | 2.7 | 2.4 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 57.4% | — | 0.0 | 81.8% | 16.3% | |
| 12 | Christian Villegas | G | Sr | 6'2" | 5-0 | 3.4 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 21.4% | 20.0% | 1.0 | 50.0% | 31.6% | |
| 20 | Amarco Doyle | F | So | 6'7" | 3-0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 50.0% | 33.3% | 3.0 | — | 39.9% | |
| 7 | Teysean Eaglestaff | F | So | 6'7" | 4-0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5 | — | 21.2% | |
| 2 | Omarr Smith | G | Fr | 6'4" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
UTEP2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted UTEP's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 | Kaseem Watson | F | Jr | 6'9" | 31-28 | 31.4 | 12.5 | 5.0 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 47.7% | 38.2% | 4.9 | 81.7% | 26.3% | |
| 15 | Jamal West Jr. | F | Sr | 6'6" | 31-31 | 31.1 | 14.5 | 6.6 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 56.4% | 29.6% | 0.9 | 66.3% | 27.1% | |
| 1 | KJ Thomas | G | So | 6'1" | 31-24 | 28.5 | 5.8 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 44.9% | 25.4% | 2.0 | 73.1% | 15.7% | |
| 33 | Elijah Jones | F | Jr | 6'8" | 31-31 | 28.1 | 13.1 | 5.4 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 55.4% | 38.6% | 4.1 | 69.2% | 26.9% | |
| 4 | Caleb Blackwell | G | Jr | 6'1" | 28-27 | 30.4 | 10.6 | 2.6 | 2.9 | 1.7 | 50.0% | 36.4% | 4.7 | 69.6% | 23.3% | |
| 23 | Cassius Brooks | G | Sr | 6'0" | 30-4 | 13.8 | 2.8 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 43.7% | 31.6% | 0.6 | 80.8% | 14.8% | |
| 11 | Trey Horton III | G | Jr | 6'5" | 25-4 | 15.2 | 3.3 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 39.8% | 27.4% | 2.9 | 61.5% | 18.0% | |
| 7 | LA Hayes | G | Jr | 6'5" | 27-1 | 11.2 | 4.3 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 42.7% | 26.3% | 1.4 | 73.9% | 25.6% | |
| 25 | Mouhamed Mbaye | C | Jr | 6'10" | 24-0 | 7.0 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 40.0% | — | 0.0 | 47.1% | 9.5% | |
| 5 | Tyreese Watson | G | Sr | 6'4" | 7-5 | 23.9 | 8.0 | 1.9 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 38.7% | 29.4% | 2.4 | 60.0% | 29.7% | |
| 0 | David Tubek | F | Jr | 6'7" | 12-0 | 8.8 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 43.8% | 33.3% | 1.3 | 62.5% | 27.4% | |
| 3 | Bobby Montgomery Jr. | G | Fr | 6'5" | 16-0 | 5.1 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 42.9% | 0.0% | 0.2 | 14.3% | 15.6% | |
| 6 | C.J. Smith | F | So | 6'7" | 11-0 | 7.4 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 38.2% | 33.3% | 0.8 | 75.0% | 18.2% | |
| 2 | Jordan Hernandez | G | Jr | 5'11" | 7-0 | 4.6 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0% | — | 0.0 | 100.0% | 8.5% |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
Trends
Last 10 games of 2025-26UTEP
Against the spread
Season
13-15
Home
6-7
Road
7-6
Last 10
6-4
avg cover +1.4
Missed the spread in the last gameCovered 5 of 8 as an underdog
Over / under
Season
11-16-1
Home
4-8-1
Road
7-6
Last 10
3-6-1
avg vs total +1.9
Under in the last gameOver in 3 of 8 as an underdog, 1 push
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7 | Jax State | H | L 61–64 | −1.0 | L−4.0 | 139.0 | U125 | 91.1 | 95.6 | 67.0 |
| Mar 5 | Kennesaw St | H | W 78–71 | +3.5 | W+10.5 | 149.0 | P149 | 104.1 | 94.7 | 74.9 |
| Feb 28 | Western KY | A | L 65–97 | +9.0 | L−23.0 | 146.5 | O162 | 90.2 | 134.7 | 72.0 |
| Feb 26 | MTSU | A | L 67–77 | +8.5 | L−1.5 | 139.5 | O144 | 98.2 | 112.8 | 68.3 |
| Feb 21 | New Mexico St | A | L 63–67 | +7.0 | W+3.0 | 143.0 | U130 | 108.2 | 115.0 | 58.3 |
| Feb 14 | Liberty | H | L 64–73 | +6.5 | L−2.5 | 138.5 | U137 | 104.3 | 118.9 | 61.4 |
| Feb 11 | Jax State | A | W 69–64 | +6.5 | W+11.5 | 135.5 | U133 | 115.3 | 107.0 | 59.8 |
| Feb 7 | New Mexico St | H | W 91–88 OT | +1.5 | W+4.5 | 138.0 | O179 | 111.7 | 108.0 | 81.5 |
| Feb 4 | Sam Houston | A | L 66–70 | +10.0 | W+6.0 | 144.5 | U136 | 94.6 | 100.4 | 69.7 |
| Jan 31 | Delaware | H | W 70–55 | −6.0 | W+9.0 | 128.0 | U125 | 112.3 | 88.2 | 62.3 |
New Mexico St
Against the spread
Season
14-15
Home
6-6
Road
5-6
Last 10
5-5
avg cover −0.9
Missed the spread in the last gameCovered 2 of 5 as a favoriteCovered 3 of 5 as an underdog
Over / under
Season
17-12
Home
7-5
Road
8-3
Last 10
6-4
avg vs total +4.7
Under 3 straightOver in 2 of 5 as a favoriteOver in 4 of 5 as an underdog
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11 | Sam Houston | N | L 61–69 | +4.5 | L−3.5 | 155.0 | U130 | 85.3 | 96.5 | 71.5 |
| Mar 10 | Jax State | N | W 68–63 | −1.5 | W+3.5 | 142.0 | U131 | 105.9 | 98.1 | 64.2 |
| Mar 7 | Kennesaw St | H | W 79–76 | −1.0 | W+2.0 | 157.5 | U155 | 116.9 | 112.5 | 67.6 |
| Mar 5 | Jax State | H | W 77–75 OT | −6.0 | L−4.0 | 145.5 | O152 | 101.5 | 98.8 | 75.9 |
| Feb 28 | MTSU | A | L 85–86 OT | +5.5 | W+4.5 | 148.0 | O171 | 113.0 | 114.3 | 75.2 |
| Feb 26 | Western KY | A | L 70–93 | +5.5 | L−17.5 | 151.5 | O163 | 88.7 | 117.8 | 78.9 |
| Feb 21 | UTEP | H | W 67–63 | −7.0 | L−3.0 | 143.0 | U130 | 115.0 | 108.2 | 58.3 |
| Feb 14 | Jax State | A | W 79–70 | +2.5 | W+11.5 | 140.5 | O149 | 119.9 | 106.3 | 65.9 |
| Feb 11 | Liberty | H | L 75–77 | +3.5 | W+1.5 | 144.0 | O152 | 111.4 | 114.4 | 67.3 |
| Feb 7 | UTEP | A | L 88–91 OT | −1.5 | L−4.5 | 138.0 | O179 | 108.0 | 111.7 | 81.5 |
Records vs the closing line describe the past; ten games is a small sample.
Tale of the tape
national rank toned left for away, right for homeUTEPNew Mexico St
Efficiency
103.1
108.7
109.2
108.9
66.9
67.8
—
—
Shooting
48.3%
48.5%
46.5%
48.5%
33.9%
32.4%
70.4%
73.5%
33.4%
34.9%
Ball control & glass
17.4%
15.0%
18.0%
14.7%
26.2%
32.5%
32.8%
30.3%
9.4%
9.0%
8.4%
8.1%
Style
40.3%
38.7%
37.2%
38.3%
13.7%
15.2%
48.0%
49.3%
26.8%
37.6%
Roster
3.07
3.41
6'4.9"
6'4.7"
—
—
Offseason
roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model inputUTEP
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted UTEP's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.
Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)
New Mexico St
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted New Mexico St's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.
Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)
Head-to-head
this season and last| Date | Season | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Thu, Nov 12 | 2026-27 | New Mexico St 0 – 0 UTEP |
| Sat, Feb 21 | 2025-26 | UTEP 63 – 67 New Mexico St |
| Sat, Feb 7 | 2025-26 | New Mexico St 88 – 91 UTEP |
The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.
What these numbers mean: line shopping.