CBB Matchups
Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.
College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.
Non-conferenceNeutral siteResorts World Event Center, Las Vegas, NV
Pacific
Efficiency #126
2025-26: 18-15 · 9-11 conf
vs
Omaha
Efficiency #257
2025-26: 16-17 · 9-9 conf
Thu, Nov 26 · TBD
74.0
win 66%
Projected
69.2
win 34%
No line posted yet.
Model: PAC −4.8 · total 143.3 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3
Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.
How the projection is built
each step, from an average D-I game to this oneProjected total
Average D-I game
148.2
PaceAdjusted tempo: Omaha 68.2, Pacific 66.4 → 66.2 possessions
−4.5
Omaha offense vs Pacific defense
−2.7
Pacific offense vs Omaha defense
+2.2
Projected total
143.3
Axis starts at 135 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Projected margin
Even game
0.0
Omaha offense vs Pacific defense
−2.7
Pacific offense vs Omaha defense
−2.2
Pacific by 4.8
4.8
Pacific side ◂▸ Omaha side
Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1: the total steps add to 143.2 against a projected 143.3, and the margin steps add to −4.9 against −4.8. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help Omaha.
Pace & total
possessions per 40 minutesTempo, possessions per 40 minutes
Projected possessions: 66.2, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, Omaha is the faster team (68.6, #166 of 365) and Pacific the slower (65.8, #300). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).
Projected possessions
66.2
per team, 40 min
Projected total
143.3
model
Projected team totals
74.0 / 69.2
Pacific / Omaha
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
66.4#325
Pacific
68.2#193
Omaha
How this game plays
what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meetAdvantageOmaha
Where Omaha struggles: the offensive glass
Omaha rebounds 25.5% of its own misses (#331); Pacific lets opponents grab 25.0% of their own misses (#8). Expect about 24.4%, 6.0 points below an average D1 matchup — worth roughly -3.7 points per 100 possessions.
AdvantagePacific
Where Pacific scores: shooting
Pacific shoots an effective 52.2% (#140); Omaha allows 52.7% (#258). Expect about 52.5%, 1.3 points above an average D1 matchup — worth roughly +1.8 points per 100 possessions.
TurnoversOmaha
Omaha protects the ball
Projected turnover rate of 15.3% is worth roughly +1.8 points per 100 possessions for Omaha's offense.
GlassPacific
Pacific owns the glass
Projected offensive rebound rate of 33.0% is worth roughly +1.6 points per 100 possessions for Pacific's offense.
ClashPacific
Style clash: 3-point volume
Pacific rarely shoots threes (35.3% of its shots); Omaha lets opponents take 45.5% of their shots from three (D1 average 39.5%). Expect about 40.1% — the offense's habit usually carries a bit more weight (0.80 vs 0.64).
Pacific has the ball
OffenseOmaha allowsvs D1 avg
52.2% #140
52.7% #258
+1.8 pt/100
20.1% #349
14.1% #333
-0.2 pt/100
35.3% #42
28.7% #90
+1.6 pt/100
30.5% #297
33.6% #142
-0.4 pt/100
75.5% #66
—
+0.3 pt/100
Pacific net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +3.1 pts/100
Omaha has the ball
OffensePacific allowsvs D1 avg
52.2% #139
50.0% #101
-0.2 pt/100
16.1% #145
15.1% #273
+1.8 pt/100
25.5% #331
25.0% #8
-3.7 pt/100
34.5% #196
36.3% #219
+0.1 pt/100
73.2% #164
—
+0.1 pt/100
Omaha net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: -1.9 pts/100
Shot diet
Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbersPacificoffense vsOmahadefense
Share of shots by zone
Pacific shoots
41.8
8.8
14.6
34.7
Omaha allows
35.1
7.8
11.8
45.4
D-I average
38.5
6.4
15.8
39.3
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 54.6%#311 | 64.6%#346 | 58.6% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 45.4%#57 | 39.7%#182 | 39.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 44.9%#16 | 41.6%#291 | 38.0% |
| Three | 35.8%#65 | 32.9%#114 | 33.7% |
Omahaoffense vsPacificdefense
Share of shots by zone
Omaha shoots
38.8
7.4
13.0
40.8
Pacific allows
30.2
8.3
19.3
42.3
D-I average
38.5
6.4
15.8
39.3
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 58.9%#165 | 57.0%#113 | 58.6% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 40.7%#155 | 39.7%#183 | 39.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 41.5%#71 | 37.7%#151 | 38.0% |
| Three | 34.0%#169 | 34.7%#233 | 33.7% |
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three
Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).
Shot volume
Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbersPacific
−1.4extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#252 of 365
Off reb %
35.3%
#42
Def reb %
75.0%
#8
Turnover %
20.1%
#349
Forced TO %
15.1%
#273
FT rate
30.5%
#297
FT allowed
36.3%
#219
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+1.6
Defensive rebounding+1.8
Ball security−2.2
Forcing turnovers−1.1
Foul shots drawn−1.2
Foul shots allowed−0.3
Omaha
−2.0extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#269 of 365
Off reb %
25.5%
#331
Def reb %
71.3%
#90
Turnover %
16.1%
#145
Forced TO %
14.1%
#333
FT rate
34.5%
#196
FT allowed
33.6%
#142
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−1.6
Defensive rebounding+0.6
Ball security+0.5
Forcing turnovers−1.8
Foul shots drawn−0.1
Foul shots allowed+0.4
Pacific has more extra scoring chances per game: −1.4 (#252 of 365) to Omaha’s −2.0 (#269).
Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).
Rotation
Pacific2025-26 numbers
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | TJ Wainwright | G | Sr | 6'3" | 33-33 | 31.9 | 13.0 | 3.8 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 52.0% | 38.8% | 5.5 | 92.0% | 24.9% | |
| 6 | Jaden Clayton | G | Sr | 6'1" | 33-24 | 30.4 | 7.9 | 3.3 | 6.4 | 2.5 | 44.0% | 30.2% | 3.5 | 75.0% | 21.7% | |
| 1 | Justin Rochelin | G | Sr | 6'5" | 33-33 | 27.2 | 9.1 | 6.4 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 52.3% | 38.1% | 2.5 | 79.8% | 22.0% | |
| 14 | Isaac Jack | F | Sr | 6'11" | 33-33 | 21.6 | 9.1 | 5.3 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 67.4% | — | 0.0 | 59.7% | 21.5% | |
| 9 | Kajus Kublickas | G | Jr | 6'2" | 33-9 | 20.2 | 5.6 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 1.9 | 42.1% | 27.8% | 2.4 | 71.4% | 23.7% | |
| 15 | Jaion Pitt | F | Fr | 6'7" | 33-0 | 17.3 | 4.7 | 3.7 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 68.8% | 66.7% | 0.2 | 63.4% | 13.0% | |
| 24 | KC Ibekwe | C | Sr | 6'11" | 32-0 | 9.3 | 3.8 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 59.6% | — | 0.0 | 29.6% | 26.9% | |
| 0 | Alexis Marmolejos | G | Sr | 6'2" | 24-0 | 9.5 | 3.8 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 45.1% | 30.2% | 2.2 | 84.2% | 26.8% | |
| 11 | Emmanuel Manyuon | G | Jr | 6'2" | 13-0 | 3.2 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 58.3% | 33.3% | 0.2 | — | 11.6% | |
| 17 | Eyal Harel | G | Fr | 6'7" | 3-0 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 150.0% | 100.0% | 0.7 | — | 11.4% | |
| 3 | Carlsheon Young | G | Fr | 6'4" | 1-0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | 40.8% | |
| 13 | Kellen Hampton | F | Fr | 6'7" | 1-0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | 0.0% | |
| 7 | Augustas Brazdeikis | F | Jr | 6'8" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 21 | Clayton Mpiana | F | Fr | 6'9" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 4 | Dominic Capriotti | G | Jr | 6'4" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 22 | Kris Keinys | F | Jr | 6'8" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 12 | Noah Budu | G | So | 6'1" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
Omaha2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted Omaha's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Lance Waddles | G | Sr | 6'4" | 33-33 | 29.4 | 12.8 | 4.8 | 2.1 | 1.4 | 55.6% | 38.0% | 6.2 | 66.7% | 25.4% | |
| 32 | Tony Osburn | G | Sr | 6'2" | 29-28 | 32.8 | 11.6 | 3.0 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 53.3% | 36.8% | 6.3 | 78.6% | 20.2% | |
| 5 | Ja'Sean Glover | G | Sr | 6'5" | 31-8 | 25.9 | 11.6 | 4.0 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 49.2% | 28.3% | 3.2 | 86.7% | 27.5% | |
| 3 | Grant Stubblefield | G | Jr | 6'1" | 26-22 | 28.5 | 9.3 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 1.6 | 55.9% | 33.3% | 1.5 | 77.6% | 19.0% | |
| 11 | Paul Djobet | G | Jr | 6'7" | 20-18 | 29.9 | 17.4 | 6.6 | 1.9 | 2.4 | 58.0% | 41.5% | 4.1 | 72.0% | 33.0% | |
| 22 | Kamryn Thomas | F | Sr | 6'8" | 28-14 | 20.8 | 4.7 | 3.5 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 48.6% | 34.6% | 1.9 | 62.2% | 15.9% | |
| 44 | Brock Scholl | F | Fr | 6'8" | 33-9 | 14.5 | 4.1 | 3.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 44.8% | 25.0% | 0.1 | 71.1% | 17.8% | |
| 15 | Christian Richardson | C | Sr | 7'1" | 27-16 | 15.7 | 7.4 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 72.7% | — | 0.0 | 59.7% | 23.7% | |
| 25 | Khamani Cooper | G | Jr | 6'4" | 26-9 | 16.1 | 4.8 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 46.9% | 33.3% | 2.1 | 76.9% | 21.4% | |
| 21 | Valentino Simon | F | Sr | 6'6" | 30-8 | 12.5 | 3.7 | 3.1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 53.6% | 0.0% | 0.1 | 64.9% | 17.0% | |
| 2 | Julian Margrave | F | Sr | 6'10" | 20-0 | 9.8 | 3.9 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 47.4% | 31.7% | 3.0 | 100.0% | 25.3% | |
| 12 | Aidan Skradis | G | So | 6'4" | 12-0 | 7.7 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 36.7% | 25.0% | 1.0 | 100.0% | 12.9% | |
| 0 | Benji Nelson | F | So | 6'8" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 20 | Brandon Orgilbold | G | — | 6'0" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 10 | Deng Mayar | F | Sr | 6'7" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 24 | Isaac Ondekane | C | Sr | 6'8" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 1 | Rob Matos | G | Jr | 5'9" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
Pacific2025-26 numbers
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | TJ Wainwright | G | Sr | 6'3" | 33-33 | 31.9 | 13.0 | 3.8 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 52.0% | 38.8% | 5.5 | 92.0% | 24.9% | |
| 6 | Jaden Clayton | G | Sr | 6'1" | 33-24 | 30.4 | 7.9 | 3.3 | 6.4 | 2.5 | 44.0% | 30.2% | 3.5 | 75.0% | 21.7% | |
| 1 | Justin Rochelin | G | Sr | 6'5" | 33-33 | 27.2 | 9.1 | 6.4 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 52.3% | 38.1% | 2.5 | 79.8% | 22.0% | |
| 14 | Isaac Jack | F | Sr | 6'11" | 33-33 | 21.6 | 9.1 | 5.3 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 67.4% | — | 0.0 | 59.7% | 21.5% | |
| 9 | Kajus Kublickas | G | Jr | 6'2" | 33-9 | 20.2 | 5.6 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 1.9 | 42.1% | 27.8% | 2.4 | 71.4% | 23.7% | |
| 15 | Jaion Pitt | F | Fr | 6'7" | 33-0 | 17.3 | 4.7 | 3.7 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 68.8% | 66.7% | 0.2 | 63.4% | 13.0% | |
| 24 | KC Ibekwe | C | Sr | 6'11" | 32-0 | 9.3 | 3.8 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 59.6% | — | 0.0 | 29.6% | 26.9% | |
| 0 | Alexis Marmolejos | G | Sr | 6'2" | 24-0 | 9.5 | 3.8 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 45.1% | 30.2% | 2.2 | 84.2% | 26.8% | |
| 11 | Emmanuel Manyuon | G | Jr | 6'2" | 13-0 | 3.2 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 58.3% | 33.3% | 0.2 | — | 11.6% | |
| 17 | Eyal Harel | G | Fr | 6'7" | 3-0 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 150.0% | 100.0% | 0.7 | — | 11.4% | |
| 3 | Carlsheon Young | G | Fr | 6'4" | 1-0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | 40.8% | |
| 13 | Kellen Hampton | F | Fr | 6'7" | 1-0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | 0.0% | |
| 7 | Augustas Brazdeikis | F | Jr | 6'8" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 21 | Clayton Mpiana | F | Fr | 6'9" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 4 | Dominic Capriotti | G | Jr | 6'4" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 22 | Kris Keinys | F | Jr | 6'8" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 12 | Noah Budu | G | So | 6'1" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
Trends
Last 10 games of 2025-26Pacific
Against the spread
Season
15-14-2
Home
4-6-2
Road
7-8
Last 10
4-5-1
avg cover −0.2
Covered 2 straightCovered 2 of 4 as a favorite, 1 pushCovered 2 of 6 as an underdog
Over / under
Season
11-20
Home
2-10
Road
9-6
Last 10
3-7
avg vs total −2.7
Under 4 straightOver in 1 of 4 as a favoriteOver in 2 of 6 as an underdog
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8 | Santa Clara | N | L 68–76 | +9.5 | W+1.5 | 148.0 | U144 | 114.9 | 128.4 | 59.2 |
| Mar 7 | Seattle U | N | W 61–58 | −1.0 | W+2.0 | 129.5 | U119 | 94.5 | 89.9 | 64.6 |
| Feb 28 | San Francisco | H | L 61–72 | −4.5 | L−15.5 | 143.5 | U133 | 94.6 | 111.7 | 64.5 |
| Feb 21 | #11Gonzaga | A | L 62–71 | +21.5 | W+12.5 | 143.5 | U133 | 101.3 | 116.0 | 61.2 |
| Feb 18 | Washington St | A | L 70–87 | +2.5 | L−14.5 | 143.5 | O157 | 106.8 | 132.8 | 65.5 |
| Feb 14 | Saint Mary's | H | L 61–72 | +7.0 | L−4.0 | 135.5 | U133 | 96.2 | 113.5 | 63.4 |
| Feb 11 | LMU | H | W 65–59 | −6.0 | P0.0 | 141.5 | U124 | 103.2 | 93.7 | 63.0 |
| Feb 7 | Pepperdine | A | W 92–59 | −7.5 | W+25.5 | 142.5 | O151 | 126.8 | 81.3 | 72.5 |
| Feb 4 | Santa Clara | H | L 56–71 | +6.0 | L−9.0 | 151.5 | U127 | 87.4 | 110.9 | 64.1 |
| Jan 31 | San Francisco | A | L 82–87 | +4.0 | L−1.0 | 138.0 | O169 | 121.1 | 128.4 | 67.7 |
Omaha
Against the spread
Season
14-15
Home
6-4
Road
7-8
Last 10
6-4
avg cover −0.6
Missed the spread in the last gameCovered 3 of 4 as a favoriteCovered 3 of 6 as an underdog
Over / under
Season
13-16
Home
4-6
Road
7-8
Last 10
4-6
avg vs total +0.5
Under 3 straightOver in 1 of 4 as a favoriteOver in 3 of 6 as an underdog
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7 | N Dakota St | N | L 50–74 | +8.0 | L−16.0 | 147.0 | U124 | 73.8 | 109.2 | 67.8 |
| Mar 6 | South Dakota | N | W 76–62 | −2.0 | W+12.0 | 151.5 | U138 | 117.4 | 95.8 | 64.7 |
| Feb 28 | St Thomas | A | L 53–68 | +11.5 | L−3.5 | 159.5 | U121 | 81.3 | 104.3 | 65.2 |
| Feb 25 | South Dakota | A | L 72–89 | −1.5 | L−18.5 | 153.5 | O161 | 98.3 | 121.5 | 73.3 |
| Feb 18 | Oral Roberts | H | W 80–71 | −6.5 | W+2.5 | 152.0 | U151 | 121.2 | 107.6 | 66.0 |
| Feb 15 | Denver | H | W 83–76 | −2.5 | W+4.5 | 160.5 | U159 | 125.7 | 115.1 | 66.0 |
| Feb 12 | St Thomas | H | W 98–94 | +4.5 | W+8.5 | 156.5 | O192 | 132.5 | 127.1 | 74.0 |
| Feb 7 | N Dakota St | A | L 84–92 | +9.5 | W+1.5 | 144.5 | O176 | 125.2 | 137.2 | 67.1 |
| Feb 5 | North Dakota | A | L 73–76 | +2.0 | L−1.0 | 150.0 | U149 | 107.0 | 111.4 | 68.3 |
| Jan 31 | Denver | A | W 84–82 | +2.5 | W+4.5 | 157.5 | O166 | 117.0 | 114.2 | 71.8 |
Records vs the closing line describe the past; ten games is a small sample.
Tale of the tape
national rank toned left for away, right for homePacificOmaha
Efficiency
108.8
106.6
106.4
111.5
66.4
68.2
—
—
Shooting
52.2%
52.2%
51.3%
53.0%
35.8%
34.0%
75.5%
73.2%
30.5%
34.5%
Ball control & glass
20.1%
16.1%
15.1%
14.1%
35.3%
25.5%
25.0%
28.7%
9.9%
9.1%
10.6%
10.5%
Style
35.3%
40.9%
45.9%
41.6%
9.7%
10.2%
58.0%
46.9%
27.8%
30.1%
Roster
3.55
3.49
6'4.7"
6'5.3"
82.8%
—
Offseason
roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model inputPacific
Returning minutes: 82.8%Returning production: 78.1%
Lost
- Elias Ralph 34.6 mpg, 16.7 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
- Kris Keinys no D1 minutes last season
- Noah Budu no D1 minutes last season
- Dominic Capriotti no D1 minutes last season
- Augustas Brazdeikis no D1 minutes last season
- Clayton Mpiana no D1 minutes last season
No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.
Returns 83% of last season's minutes; lost 1 of its top 5. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026).
Omaha
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted Omaha's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.
Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)
Head-to-head
this season and lastNo meetings the last two seasons.
The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.
What these numbers mean: line shopping.